Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
Amberly said "I was not speaking to that because I had not w
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-02-01 10:54:00, Anonymous wrote:
"As usual, your talking like a lunatic; as in; your reasoning lacks logic. You have no good excuse for doing this. You can?t twist one up with warped logic.
Amberly has *Nothing* to do with your legal situation.
She has *Never* changed her account.
She has been honest, and forthcoming and selfless.
You flipped when you saw a document where she went into more detail than you had seen before.
This has had to be explained to you before; more detail dies not equate to a changed account.
Come on up out of the mud Carey. That hole you keep digging has got to be getting unpleasant. It is certainly getting deep. Its nice up here in the light of reality. Come give it a try.
"
--- End quote ---
Wanna know what's warped? Look in the mirror, anon. Your head is on backwards!
:rofl:
Anonymous:
This is what she said:
--- Quote ---"She said she had not witnessed abuse and mistreatment. How is it that you see that as not going into more detail."
--- End quote ---
and this is your explanation?
--- Quote ---You flipped when you saw a document where she went into more detail than you had seen before
--- End quote ---
Are you really able to twist that from "not witnessing abuse" to "lack of detail."
Answer this, have you seen her sworn testimony in the court custody case of the child at Dundee. The one in which she testified to the greatness of the program and how she thought it was the best thing for the child and where she told the judge she recommended the child remain at Dundee? Have you seen it? Do you even know of its existance? If you do, how do you explain it?
Carey:
That was me.
Anonymous:
What's this Amberly person doing now and whatever happened to the investigation in Costa Rica?
Anonymous:
I've seen it. I understand the circumstances and timeing of events and how and why it makes a difference.
What I would have said 18 months ago isn't what I would say today; there is a reason for that; and it has nothing to do with a lack of honesty.
Other 'discrepencies' you like to harp about are examples of additional detail, as the circumstances required.
None of this however; has diddley squat to do with you and your legal problems.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version