Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry

Amberly said "I was not speaking to that because I had not w

<< < (4/13) > >>

Anonymous:

--- Quote ---You have said your twins claim no one was battered at Dundee; but they told the reporter that while they weren't, others were.
--- End quote ---


Both of the twins have told me stories about abuse behind the walls of WWASP schools.  The stories they tell about are not about anything they themselves witnessed.  The stories they have shared are about what they have heard others tell.  The difference in what they share and what Amberly shares is the fact that they are not willing to lie for ANYONE, not even for themselves. They hated the place, with a passion.  They did not like what they were put through and they did not like the fact that others had to endure it either.  However, they are not willing to lie about their experience in order to tell others how wrong they feel the place was.  Amberly is a liar, she lied in a sworn statement.  It is plain and simple and she should be held accountable.

By the way my twins have not said she lied about the abuse at Dundee, they have said they never witnessed it.  They have said she lied in one of those many sworn statements.  They are smart enough to know that they (Amberly's sworn statements) all can't be true, they are far too contradictory.  They are also smart enough to know that based on her ability to swear according to what side of the fence she is on, sure hurts her creditability.

Carey:
That was me.

Carey:

--- Quote ---Are they eye witnesses to any event that Amberly has described in such a way that they feel she lied about it?
--- End quote ---


They have seen her emails to me.  They have seen where she said she did not witness abuse.  They have seen all three of her statements. They have seen where she has lied.

How can anyone be an eyewitness to something that never happened.  Amberly herself said she did not witness abuse.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-02-02 10:12 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-02-02 10:13 ]

Anonymous:
Who is the anon posting back and forth to Carey that seems to know so much about what somebody (Amberly) thinks or doesn't think?  What is their interest in this matter and why can't they reveal their identity, if nothing else, for the sake of establishing their own credibility, which is obviously a big issue with them?

Anonymous:
AQ: why can't they reveal their identity, if nothing else, for the sake of establishing their own credibility, which is obviously a big issue with them?


Maybe for the same reason you don't/can't, whatever.
Dose your credibility matter to you?


I don't claim to know So Much about what Amberly may or may not think. I am however familiar with the various circumstances involved with the statements she has made; and this familiarity makes me feel confident in her integrity and decency and honesty.
My familiarity with Carey makes me all to aware of other traits. . .
My interest in the matter?
Same as yours I expect; or close to it. Additionally, I want readers to be aware Carey is Not the all knowing voice of authority she makes herself out to be.

As for your additional comments Carey, they are just a rehash of what we have already gone over; and I know from experience, there is no way you can back down and admit you are mistaken; so the debate just goes around and around and around.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page