Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
Where did the Proud ex Trekker go? The one who does not wan
scottT:
The topic of my discussion was your demand for names and impugning the honor of those who wish to remain anonymous -- not your individual obsession with certain programs and individuals.
Nothing I said could remotely be construed as favoring certain programs. Again, I believe you serve the interests of certain organizations by interpreting any post that doesn't share your particular world view into a supposed endorsement of PURE.
People fighting abusive behavior mod (REGARDLESS of referral agency) have as much reason to fear SLAPP suits as the underground railway transporters had to fear criminal prosecution.
As such, your characterization of my example as "irony" is not particularly apt. Both sets of programs can be judged by the same criteria --Similar facts warrant similar conclusions. I have no dog in this fight. Other people might.
Nonetheless, a person who who wished to remain anonymous while opposing the programs which are foremost in your mind is entitled to equal dignity with the persons who oppose the programs which the trekkers oppose. Similar facts, similar conclusions. I don't serve the interests of either program. Other people might.
Lamentably, these are times of persecution (ask Ginger). If the program is abusive, lets oppose it. I see nothing constructive in drumming up more business for the loathesome ones' attorneys by insisting people reveal their identities as a condition of participating in this forum. Other people might.
[ This Message was edited by: scottT on 2004-01-04 12:09 ]
[ This Message was edited by: scottT on 2004-01-04 12:10 ]
[ This Message was edited by: scottT on 2004-01-04 12:19 ]
Anonymous:
Scott whats your affiliation with PUREST?
Are you the anonomous proud EX-Trekker?
Anonymous:
Help, I just read this on another forum, and am wondering what in the world is going on here. Scott T., you seem to be a stand-up guy, can you answer the questions posed at the bottom of Ms. Bock's post? Honestly, I am NOT trying to stir the pot, just looking for straight answers. This has got me really troubled, darn near sick to my stomach.
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... m=9&Sort=D
Anonymous:
Then tell me Scott, why do you object so adamantly to my exposure of Sue and PURE?
And:
--- Quote --- the honor of those who wish to remain anonymous -- not your individual obsession with certain programs and individuals.
--- End quote ---
I didn't link this person to "certain programs and individuals", he/she did with what they said. "I proud ex Trekker."
The "honor" of an anonymous poster? The honor of one who has called me a liar and hides behind a bag? Where is the honor in that? I take someone calling me a liar personal. If you think it is ok for someone to call another indvidual a liar and not say who you are and not back it up with any kind of proof...then I say your definition of who and what is honorable is questionable.
Carey:
That was me. Ginger could you delete this post and add my name to the one above addressed to Scott.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version