Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
Where did the Proud ex Trekker go? The one who does not wan
Anonymous:
Ginger, you make the point:
Or, in context, "Scott, for someone who has no interest in protecting PURE and Sue...you wouldn't happen to be the same attorney posting anonymously on the web hostess forum claiming to have a copy of Sue's suit against me and Ginger would you? Hmmm...no interest, then why would you have a copy of her law suit?"
It's a question, Anon. Not a statement of fact. And I think it's a valid question. And I hope Scott will answer it. Why in the world would he not answer it? I'm guessing he will.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh yeah, I'm guessing he will too, and it'll be interesting and to the point as always.
My point however; while admittedly fuzzy; was this:
She began with a question
(you wouldn't happen to be the same attorney posting anonymously on the web hostess forum claiming to have a copy of Sue's suit against me and Ginger would you?)
and before she could stop and hit send, she went on to make an apparent statement of fact.
(Hmmm...no interest, then why would you have a copy of her law suit?" )
She has clearly assumed the answer to her first question is Yes; and gone on to 'question' the lack of interest Mr. T has explained; insinuating he is a liar.
She went from wondering about something to assuming it to be true in just that short a period of time. This is typical for the lady in question. This is a pattern worth noting.
I think it, therefore it's true, seems to be her way of dealing with life.
If the bug gets far enough up her butt, there'll be no dissuading her; and she'll start a new campaign against yet another imagined evil foe.
Antigen:
Argh! Just browsing through then hitting the sack.
The quotes are random. It's a profile feature.
All the anons, really, seriously, the only (additional to what the server logs now) information I would have about anyone when they register a username is whatever you fill out. I don't care if it's correct or bogus. Some features won't work w/o a correct email address, but they're non-essential. If you don't want a cookie, fine, you'll just have to log in each time you want to post. That's what the cookie does. It keeps track of how long it's been since the user hit a page and keeps you logged in for 12 hours so you don't have to do that.
You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence.
--Charles Austin Beard
--- End quote ---
[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2004-01-04 21:59 ]
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-01-04 21:10:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Ginger, you make the point:
Or, in context, "Scott, for someone who has no interest in protecting PURE and Sue...you wouldn't happen to be the same attorney posting anonymously on the web hostess forum claiming to have a copy of Sue's suit against me and Ginger would you? Hmmm...no interest, then why would you have a copy of her law suit?"
It's a question, Anon. Not a statement of fact. And I think it's a valid question. And I hope Scott will answer it. Why in the world would he not answer it? I'm guessing he will.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh yeah, I'm guessing he will too, and it'll be interesting and to the point as always.
My point however; while admittedly fuzzy; was this:
She began with a question
(you wouldn't happen to be the same attorney posting anonymously on the web hostess forum claiming to have a copy of Sue's suit against me and Ginger would you?)
and before she could stop and hit send, she went on to make an apparent statement of fact.
(Hmmm...no interest, then why would you have a copy of her law suit?" )
She has clearly assumed the answer to her first question is Yes; and gone on to 'question' the lack of interest Mr. T has explained; insinuating he is a liar.
She went from wondering about something to assuming it to be true in just that short a period of time. This is typical for the lady in question. This is a pattern worth noting.
I think it, therefore it's true, seems to be her way of dealing with life.
If the bug gets far enough up her butt, there'll be no dissuading her; and she'll start a new campaign against yet another imagined evil foe.
"
--- End quote ---
A pattern worth noting? Maybe to you and a couple of other people that aren't focused on the big picture. Really Anon, it's hard enough keeping up with significant details like those revealed in actual court records and depositions which speak to more important issues than whether Carey has a bug up her ass or simply jumped to the wrong conclusion. Either way, does it really matter to anybody but those who have a personal stake in this war-on-words?
:smokin:
Anonymous:
//Either way, does it really matter to anybody but those who have a personal stake in this war-on-words?//
Suposse not; but some of us do.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version