Announcements & Tech Support > Web forum hosting
Ginger, You're Only Hurting Yourself!
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-02-25 07:43:00, Anonymous wrote:
"I for one, (and I am sure there are many, many othes who feel the same) agree with Ginger's attorney, Phil Elberg: The lady should be thanked, not sued. "
--- End quote ---
Amen to that one.
Anonymous:
The nice thing is that your case would be pretty simple. It will be very easy to get tons of witnesses with plenty of horror stories concerning the overall system in the country. Then you get some from this specific academy that can shed doubt on any witnesses they produce. I'm sure there's a wealth of precedents to cite as well. If he asserts that he has been slandered then he will have to prove any information was false. He will probably only prove partial at best so you just remove the bogus posts and leave the rest.
Anonymous:
The threat to sue is pretty weird. It smells like a bluff to me. If he sues then his academy goes under a microscope. I doubt he will want that. If he was really clean he'd debate the posters rather than threatening lawsuits, don't you think?
Anonymous:
Is there any hope of soliciting more help from the press in emphasizing the horrors that are occuring in many of these places? I would think the more people know what is going on, the more they would be willing to uphold our rights to free speech.
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-01-04 06:02:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Wow, are you people freaks!
The information is no good if it does not apply to Ginger's situation. In the Complaint, which I think Deborah, and all you other nuts DO NOT HAVE, Ginger is being sued on the following combination of causes:
Injunction, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Public Disclosure of Private Facts, Defamation (False Light) and Tortious Interference with Business Relationships.
Which part of the sites you people are reading like the Bible match this exact combination of Counts contained in the Complaint? Let me help you out, NONE! Also, Ginger, tossed in her two cents and took sides (usually siding with a nut), which those sites do not cover.
I'm not saying don't look at the sites (they may have some general information that some might find helpful), what I'm saying is the laws you think shield Ginger don't!
Learn to READ people, and stop living in FANTASYLAND."
--- End quote ---
Out of those counts which ones are still valid if the facility is shown as abusive? (as in the case of Straight)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version