Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
Lillian Speerbrecker's New Accreditation Agency
none-ya.:
Perhaps we can settle this like human beings
Maybe a wet T-Shirt contest
Xerix:
Lol, and here you go again. You are missing the point. Lillian and her business or agency has nothing to do with her husband or his employment or his or her previous affiliations with said school(s) or advocacy's. Her husband and his employment is a completely different "entity" as you referred to then her and what she's trying to start. Advertising? Wow, are you really that shallow minded, especially after Lillian and her previous position within Survivors and what she does and doesn't agree with. She has always been against child abuse and the abuse in schools, are you really that retarded to think she'd immediately change on the dime and go "over to the other side" to advertise a school or program which abused her in the past if they haven't made significant changes to their "program"? Seriously.. just wow
Xerix:
Even better yet do you think she would condone her husbands employment at such an establishment? As I said, close minded.
Xerix:
--- Quote from: "FemanonFatal2.0" ---I'm sorry but I don't take your threats seriously...
Especially since I know for a fact that there are much more Anon AGAINST the abuse of children in programs then there EVER COULD be for, or even remotely care about someone as insignificant as Lillian and her tentative plans to advertise for her husband's program...
That statement was simply hilarious. Thanks for the good laugh!
--- End quote ---
DUH! Common sense. Anonymous STANDS for stopping child abuse and the abuse of children in programs. SO DOES LILLIAN. Her methods are just unorthodox and controversial. But that doesn't mean that a lot of people in Anonymous don't support what she's trying to do, because she actually is trying to do good by writing reports on DIFFERENT SCHOOLS mind you GOOD or BAD. NOT JUST the school that her husband happens to work at. That's the point you are missing. If she was "accrediting" Midwest and ONLY Midwest, then there would be some room for debate in saying that she's only "advertising" for the program at her husbands employment, but she's not. But not only has she NOT accredited or "given the stamp of approval" on anything yet, she also is planning on investigating TONS of schools, not JUST Midwest. She is not by any means condoning abuse in schools or trying to "cover up" the abuse in schools like you and others keep trying to make it seem and THAT is why a lot of people in Anonymous support her.
FemanonFatal2.0:
I don't care either way honestly, I just think it's fucked up for you to go after an whole organization after a conversation that you had with one person.
You and Lillian and any anon that support her can go ride into the sunset for all I care.
You just haven't been around long enough to know how these things go wrong, and how those programs will use her "reports" as advertisement. Her "good intentions" will only be used by the programs to to convince parents that their schools aren't abusive when they clearly are if they aren't willing to do away with restraints and seclusion.
It's okay tho, you obviously have a lot to learn about the troubled teen industry so I wont hold your ignorance against you.
You want to end this yet or what?... Because I'm leaving it at what needed to be said was said, and it's over with. So unless you want me to go into more details about why Lillian's business will fail, I suggest you leave it at that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version