Author Topic: Apologia - Serious debate only, please!  (Read 23570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2003, 01:41:00 PM »
Greg - Where did I personally say this kid would be dead, in jail, etc.?  I'm not here to talk about your statistics of kids in programs.  I was in a program.  It didn't work, I didn't want it to work.  The time there was only a few months and I was only 14.  It wasn't a private pay school.  I don't hate my mother, I didn't have any trauma from being there and I don't wonder what my life would be like if I hadn't gone there.  It was what it was...a way to get me away from what I was doing to myself, even for a short time.  I'm not even sure their "program" had all the opportunities that the current programs like wwasp, CEDU, etc., have now.  It's really not important to me.

You are focusing on the money aspect of these programs.  If some of the state run facilities weren't funded, it would cost about 350.00 per day per person on the average.  I did a little math and found that wwasp schools range from $70-133 per day for each student.  It gives the kids time to internalize (apply) what they learn so the time there increases the financial commitment.  

I've met some very successful grads from my relative's school.  I only know one that fell back to drugs, but is now doing better.  I'm not looking at statistics.  I look at the person and what they're doing.  People are not statistics to justify the monetary commitment. You're assuming they've endured torture. Are you talking about self imposed torture or physical torture at the hands of a staff person? I'd be careful of the answer to that one.  You have your view, I have mine.  They're both valid to each of us.

Is there really a way to measure success?  Success for one person is different for another.  My success in business could mean making $40,000 a year, but to another it would mean making $150,000 a year as an example.  

Clearly a death in a program would create fear in most people.  Of the thousands of kids in a wwasp program, I know of only one that died. I think she bolted from the group in what could have been a runaway attempt.  One is hard to take.  Every life is precious.  

I get that this discussion is supposed to go somewhere?  You feel these programs are bad, I feel there's a time and place for them and on the whole do an excellent job of what they are intended for.  Neither of us is going to change our views.  In a world of illusions, we wouldn't need this kind of help, nor would we need physicians to heal cancer or the military to defend our freedom.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2003, 01:44:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-18 10:27:00, Antigen wrote:


You point to one individual, kin to you, as proof of efficacy. Do you discount out of hand everyone else who's risking legal retalliation from WWASP to tell the other side of the story?



And can you explain what it is about the Program that works? How does it work? And can you point to any evidence derived from the tens or hundreds of thousands of former clients to support your assertion that the program is even somewhat likely to be more helpful than harmful?


Ginger - I just read your post. I'm out for a while, but will respond when I return.  

Added a missing end quote.

[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2003-12-18 11:28 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kiwi

  • Posts: 173
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2003, 02:39:00 PM »
Quote
Of the thousands of kids in a wwasp program, I know of only one that died. I think she bolted from the group in what could have been a runaway attempt.

She didn't bolt, she was given permission to leave the room to get something.  She took the opportunity of being unsupervised to jump from the upper floor of a building.  Though Jay Kay likes to make out it was an escape attempt, I have read nothing that says it was anywhere near the perimeter.  You are also forgetting at least two others who killed themselves when their parents threatened to send them back.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2003, 04:01:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-18 10:41:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Greg - Where did I personally say this kid would be dead, in jail, etc.?  I'm not here to talk about your statistics of kids in programs.  I was in a program.  It didn't work, I didn't want it to work.  The time there was only a few months and I was only 14.  It wasn't a private pay school.  I don't hate my mother, I didn't have any trauma from being there and I don't wonder what my life would be like if I hadn't gone there.  It was what it was...a way to get me away from what I was doing to myself, even for a short time.  I'm not even sure their "program" had all the opportunities that the current programs like wwasp, CEDU, etc., have now.  It's really not important to me.



You are focusing on the money aspect of these programs.  If some of the state run facilities weren't funded, it would cost about 350.00 per day per person on the average.  I did a little math and found that wwasp schools range from $70-133 per day for each student.  It gives the kids time to internalize (apply) what they learn so the time there increases the financial commitment.  



I've met some very successful grads from my relative's school.  I only know one that fell back to drugs, but is now doing better.  I'm not looking at statistics.  I look at the person and what they're doing.  People are not statistics to justify the monetary commitment. You're assuming they've endured torture. Are you talking about self imposed torture or physical torture at the hands of a staff person? I'd be careful of the answer to that one.  You have your view, I have mine.  They're both valid to each of us.



Is there really a way to measure success?  Success for one person is different for another.  My success in business could mean making $40,000 a year, but to another it would mean making $150,000 a year as an example.  



Clearly a death in a program would create fear in most people.  Of the thousands of kids in a wwasp program, I know of only one that died. I think she bolted from the group in what could have been a runaway attempt.  One is hard to take.  Every life is precious.  



I get that this discussion is supposed to go somewhere?  You feel these programs are bad, I feel there's a time and place for them and on the whole do an excellent job of what they are intended for.  Neither of us is going to change our views.  In a world of illusions, we wouldn't need this kind of help, nor would we need physicians to heal cancer or the military to defend our freedom.   "




You never did use the term Dead, Insane or In jail, Anon, but this is the well established program line for over 30 years used to justify the extreme, to use your word, "torture" placed on these children.  

Since you say "neither of us is going to change our views" then this is where I bow out of this discussion. It is proof positive you aren't here for debate, only to hear yourself speak in circles.  

I am forever amazed that people who haven't been thru the program themselves can actually hear people who have explained  why the program violates so many people and then witness it for themselves on these message boards  and then shut their ears to the truth. Hell, even our congress issued a report almost 30 years ago likening a predecessor program to brainwashing tactics used on Prisoners of war and hardly anyone listened. In fact, our future ambassador to Italy, deeply involved in the program,  summarily ignored it and helped start Straight Inc. He apparently felt as you, that there was a "place" for these programs.  

You have demonstrated once again that my amazement in peoples ability to ignore the truth is misplaced.  

Good day to you and to your relative.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #19 on: December 18, 2003, 04:02:00 PM »
sorry, forgot to log in, the above post is mine.

GregFL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #20 on: December 18, 2003, 04:03:00 PM »
Ok, well if you're up for it, I'll give you some depth while you're away. Then I'll be busy later and you can give me some homework.

Quote
On 2003-12-17 21:54:00, Anonymous wrote:

To both Ginger and GregFL - The evidence is what I learned by my relatives stay there. He is much better off because of what he learned about himself. Instead of the angry, defeated, drug dependent kid that went there, he's very much into doing his own thing now in a much healthier way- he's got a great sense of humor, is working toward his electrical engineering degree, has a healthy relationship with a girl and no longer puts limits on himself if he really wants something to happen. He gained new insights and skills, doesnt dwell on the past and seems to have a great life. And yes, only time will tell, but he's been in college a while and seems to be enjoying his life in a non-destructive way. He's taught me a lot.

I have had the same observation w/ my daughter. But I don't attrubute it to the people who sought to control her over the past couple of years (it wasn't just the boyfriend, the whole extended family is sick; they've all worked for him full time since he was a toddler) I attribute her success to her having had time to think, to grow up and to figure it out and to break away.

That's what usually happens. I have so much broader a perspective on this, having been involved in the industry for, literally, almost as long as I can remember. When I was a little kid, not just my family, but a significant number of families in our area went through The Seed. The program structure was a little different, but the basic method was the same; based on Synanon and very similar to methods used to break down American POWs captured during the Korean war.

For the most part, those of us "blessed" with this kind of "help" have not done as well, by any measure, as those who just grew up without all the "help". Are families are not as close, our careers not as successful, we use more drugs, drink more, are more angry and confrontational, have more nightmares, more divorces, more suicides and accute mental illness than the allegedly bad influences our parents sought to protect us from. Those folks, the ones we were never allowed to be friends with again for fear of getting sent (or sent back) to the program are firemen and city councelmen, business owners and so forth, enjoying life in the same town my whole family left as soon as possible to escape the constant threat of getting put back on front row.

You say that WWASP has only been around for a couple of years and that only one child has died in their care. You probably don't know this, but neither claim is really completely ture.

Here's some sworn testimony from 3 WWASP clients about the one girl who killed herself. It seems unlikely that she expected to survive the leap from the 4th floor. She was escaping, alright, but wasn't trying for the gate.
http://fornits.com/anonanon/docs/wwasp/toc.htm

WWASP might be generally very good at avoiding actually killing their charges and at preventing suicide while the kids are in the program. So was Straight. But I never, in all my life before or since, saw so many people cutting themselves or running full speed, head first into walls and steel support beams as when I was in the Program. And, of the 12,000 allegedly successful graduates they claim (most of whom they've never talked to since), we know of 40 deaths, over half of which have been suicides. Among survivors, just take a look around these forums!

The cover story is that the kids are all suffering symptoms of withdrawal; responding to bad feelings about themselves that they brought with them and now are unable to mask w/ drugs. That, friend, is a bald faced lie. These problems simply are not anywhere near as prevalent among the populations from which these kids have been rescued.

Quote
I don't have an answer to the "stupid rules" question, other than my view earlier. I should ask someone that's been there that learned what they're all about. Maybe it's as simple as cause and effect.


I can tell you about how that works. It's not anything like the way they advertize. Have you ever been romantically involved with an insanely jealous lover, supported by his maniacally co-dependent family? Have you ever known someone in that situation? Well, imagine that X100, but you're only 14 and you can't just storm out and go for a walk when the pressure gets to be too much. You are under intense scrutiny at every moment. You become obsessed with fear of forgetting one of the hundreds of rules and rituals. You're afraid to smile at someone or to neglect to notice someone else's minor infraction. The punishments for these minor failings can be extremely severe and you dare not give away the slightest hint of resentment or resistance. Sympathy for another kid who's getting sanctioned unfairly is also a cardinal sin; you dare not respond in any way but entheusiastic solidarity w/ the Program or there's more where that came from.

At any given moment, you might be dreaming of the day, sometime soon, when you'll get that hour off campus or call home or graduation. But you dare not get your hopes up too high because some minor little mis-step, or even a wholely false allegation by someone else, might take it all away. It is not like the kinds of rules and supervision you'll find in any workplace outside of a Communist bloc country. It is relentless, 24/7/365 and your sentence is uncertain. You're in a situation where everything is entirely beyond your control, and yet everything is your fault.

This is not accidental. This regimen puts most people in a mental state where they're very much more easily manipulated. Add to that, usually inadequate sleep (especially for kids who are under extra sanctions), minimal, often completely inadequate nutrition and the very disorienting effect of being completely cut off from the real world. I was fortunate in that I was familiar enough with the program when I went in that that aspect of it didn't have as big an impact on me. I just kept telling myself "It's all theatre, I'll get out one day".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #21 on: December 18, 2003, 04:20:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-18 10:41:00, Anonymous wrote:

Greg - Where did I personally say this kid would be dead, in jail, etc.?

Just a note. A couple of years ago, TV news magazine, 48 Hours, did an investigative report on WWASP. That's how I came to know about WWASP; a friend recomended that I watch that upcoming episode. Many aspects of the story were horrifyingly familiar to me. Among them, one of the kids interviewed repeated that same mantra, "If it hadn't been for WWASP, I would be dead, insane or in the gutter by now."

I'm not sure of the exact details of whatever connections might exist between WWASP and the Seed branch of the Program. But you tell me; how does a bizarre statement like that make the trip over 2 decades and half a continent from my childhood to this kid's?


"Youths who go through the TASKS seminars sign a pledge of secrecy, so little is known about what happens in them."

http://www.ytyt.org/infobank/document.cfm/parent/522

What's up with that? Why hide your light under a bushel, eh?

More excellent info:
Quote
In trauma-inducing captivity situations, writes reviewer Laura J. Cohen in describing Judith Lewis Herman?s 1992 book Trauma and Recovery, fear is produced "by inconsistent and unpredictable outbursts of violence and by capricious enforcement of petty rules." Captors work to eliminate victims? sense of autonomy by close scrutiny and tight control over their body and bodily functions. What is eaten and when it is eaten, what clothing is worn, timing of sleep and toiletting, all activities of daily living are out of the victim?s control in traumatic captivity. Even when the victim?s basic physical needs are adequately met, this assault on bodily autonomy shames and demoralizes.

From: http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... =11&Sort=D


 

History gives us a kind of chart, and we dare not surrender even a small rushlight in the darkness. The hasty reformer who does not remember the past will find himself condemned to repeat it.
--John Buchan





[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2003-12-18 13:26 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #22 on: December 18, 2003, 04:30:00 PM »
Just one more gem from the above referenced article:

Quote
1. How to Drive a Kid Crazy.

Writes one 14-year-old about his stay in a mental rehab facility:

"If you do what they want, you are manipulating. If you don't, then you are defiant. If you walk around the ward, then you are pacing, if you sit down, then you are withdrawn. If you say you're sick, then you're trying to get attention. If you say you're not sick, then you are in denial. If you do your schoolwork right then you are a perfectionist who is obsessive about details. If you make mistakes, then you are sloppy and obviously don't care about education. And you know what? My doctor says this hospital is good for me because it's consistent."

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad.
-- Salvador Dali

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #23 on: December 18, 2003, 08:19:00 PM »
Where are the public schools that restrain or isolate kids for looking out the window or looking at a member of the opposite sex?

There probably aren't many because that is ABUSE!  And because it doesn't do anything to help anyone.

Do you really think preventing girls from looking at guys is going to prevent them from having sexual thoughts or from trying to act on them when they aren't observed?  Why would you *want* to prevent the natural developmental process of human sexuality, which, like it or not, flowers during the teen years?  

Do you think your parents should have prevented you having a boyfriend or any dates?  young men and women haven't changed-- it's just that parents are more hysterical than ever about teen sex-- even though there's lower teen pregnancy and higher rates of safe sex than when the today's parents were young.

And does it really make sense to lock up a kid and deny him a normal adolescence because he engages in the *normal* activity (it is done by 50% of all high schoolers) of trying marijuana or drinking alcohol (done by 80% of high school seniors)?  

What gives you the right to deny someone liberty for years based on something that you don't like?

I could understand if there were evidence that youthful pot smoking and drinking *typically* lead to problems.  But we've got over half the population engaged in this-- and the vast majority of them live till 65 or older and life expectancy is going up, not down.

I could also understand if there were evidence that youthful MJ smoking or drinking caused serious academic problems in the majority-- but again, this is simply not true.

Also, I could understand if potsmoking lead to addiction in the majority of cases-- but for the vast majority, they never even try hard drugs, let alone become addicted to them.  Only 1% of the population has even tried heroin, for example-- yet 50% have smoked pot.  Gateway?  Not really.

Given this, there is simply no justification for sending them away and lowering their educational prospects (let's be real Harvard isn't going to look on WWASP as highly as a selective prep school or good public school and let's be real that learning through worksheets doesn't do you at all well preparing for science, math, pre-med or anything else that requires analytical thought).

In fact, the research finds that THE BEST ANTIDOTE TO ADDICTION IS EDUCATION.  Despite all the nonsense about addiction being an equal opportunity disease, the fact is that lasting chronic drug problems are far more common amongst those with less education and fewer employment opportunities.  So, you get your kid into a worse school *and* you spend the college fund on WWASP, thereby making the odds that he will have a lasting addiction greater, not lower.

Finally, you are confusing correlation and cause when you say that WWASP helped your relative.  You cannot know this.  The only way you could tell is if he had an identical twin that didn't go and got worse, not better-- and even then, your smaple size would be too small for any real conclusions to be drawn.

Would you want your cancer treatment based on "so and so said this works"?  Why would you give your children's mental health care any lower standard?

If you really care about your kids, you would look at the language in the WWASP contract-- which says that they will balance the weight of costs v. the weight of seeking medical care before letting your kid see a physician and run the opposite direction.

Btw,did you know how many teens die, total, in the US population each year.  20,000-- from all causes, including cancer, DWI's etc.  There are 30 million teens.  There is absolutely no way that WWASP's claims that your kid will be dead if he doesn't attend is true.

If we know that there are 30 million teens, 15 million are potsmokers and to be overly generous, 5 million are seriously abusing drugs or alcohol.  That's a death rate of 13 in 1000, just over 1/100th of a percent.  And we haven't even factored out the deaths that are from disease and non-drug/alcohol accidents.

Don't fall for the lies and the fear-mongering.  Even genuine heroin addicts, who have the worst prognosis, only die at a rate of 1-2% per year-- and that's with HIV included.  That adds up quickly, but the odds of your potsmoking binge drinker or promiscuous runaway dying from their behavior are not high.

The odds of being traumatized in an environment with no oversight where parents are told to dismiss all complaints as malingering and where employees are directed to consider cost before seeing a doctor,however....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #24 on: December 18, 2003, 08:52:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-18 17:19:00, Anonymous wrote:

"



Where are the public schools that restrain or isolate kids for looking out the window or looking at a member of the opposite sex?



There probably aren't many because that is ABUSE!  And because it doesn't do anything to help anyone.

In Broward, they don't do it on campus. They have a distributed system. The first stage of entry that looks a whole lot like the Program is called JIF (Juvenile Intervention Facility). It's located in downtown Ft. Lauderdale, near the jail, courthouse and the Crystal Cathedral, as locals sometimes call the 5 story glass office building that houses the school district administration offices.
http://www.firn.edu/schools/broward/seagull/jifinfo.htm

Kids don't just get sent there for skipping school, like the web page says. They can land up there for any infraction, including contempt of cop, that would get any adult to ask them to leave campus.

Quote

Do you really think preventing girls from looking at guys is going to prevent them from having sexual thoughts or from trying to act on them when they aren't observed?  Why would you *want* to prevent the natural developmental process of human sexuality, which, like it or not, flowers during the teen years?  


Because sexuality is an emotional hot-button and a direct line to personal autonomy.

If quitting drugs means joining the war on terrorism, does this portend the fire bombing of Amsterdamn ?

--Felton Manifestation



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
   10/80 - 10/82
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
Anonymity Anonymous

[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2003-12-18 18:43 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2003, 01:38:00 AM »
Ginger - this is my response to your question why I think the wwasp program works.  I'm not going to debate anything else this time of the evening, though!

The program cannot fail because the program is not and never was a fix-it shop for broken children.

None of the material or processes or anything about the program or the seminars is secret or mysterious or, in fact, anything that hasn't been written down in books for quite some time. What is different with the facilities under the WWASP umbrella is the approach to family healing.

It only makes sense to involve the whole family in the healing. Every family member, present, or absent, played a role in the results of today. And, it makes no sense, at all, to show a kid new tools for managing his/her life if he/she are going back into a family dynamic that hasn't changed. Some kids are strong and adaptable, They will make it, in spite of obstacles. Most are not, and the easiest course of action for all people is to fall back into old patterns.

What if a parent was wrong and sent a kid into the program that was only going through a phase? What if a "regular" kid were sent into the program?  I've talked with a lot of grads and a lot of kids who were in the program, but, did not graduate.

I firmly believe that exposure to being accountable for their own choices, and grasping that their life is truly the result of their choices will not hurt any kid.

I sort of suspect that if a kid were sent into the program by trigger-happy parents, that kid would fly through the program, and,...... benefit from it. And, be aware enough to realize that they had benefited.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2003, 03:05:00 AM »
Fine, send the parents to Devil's Island and let 'em work on being accountable for their lousy parenting skills.  No cell phones, spa treatments or Viagra until they learn to love the omnipotent program. How's that for a cost-effective solution to a strictly American malady called AFFLUENZA?

 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2003, 06:33:00 AM »
Quote
Ginger - this is my response to your question why I think the wwasp program works. I'm not going to debate anything else this time of the evening, though!

The program cannot fail because the program is not and never was a fix-it shop for broken children.

Holy Crow! The program can't fail because it doesn't promise anything? It's amazing to me that you can go through the motions of typing that and, apparently, not even understand what you're saing. Look back to the beginning of this thread. You started out from the position that, yeah, well, maybe it's torture. But a lot of things could be considered torture. And that this is justified by the wonderful success rate. Now they're not making any promises, therefore can't be expected to deliver?

What, exactly, do parents expect in return for all that money and autonomy they hand over? Nothing?

Anon, you clearly just don't want to think about it in logical terms.

Did you read the sworn testimony I linked to from Mitchell v Mitchell? Do you discard it out of hand? Or do you think the conditions and treatment these kids describe is justifiable?

Quote
On 2003-12-18 22:38:00, Anonymous wrote:

I sort of suspect that if a kid were sent into the program by trigger-happy parents, that kid would fly through the program, and,...... benefit from it. And, be aware enough to realize that they had benefited.


Sure, if it were really just good, old fashioned, strict discipline. But it's not. It's forced confession, constant psyche and emotional pressure, isolation and fear. It's harder sometimes on kids who don't have any real crimes to confess. They're forced to, not only lie about themselves, but really to believe it.


But if you just don't want to see it, you won't. I know of a good many program parents who, 20 or more years later, despite the fact that their kids barely talk to them, still swear by the Program. See, it really is all about the parents. Kids can't sign big checks.

who needs regular piss tests more than a former blowski who has his finger on the button?
--Chuck Beyer



[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2003-12-19 03:38 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Kiwi

  • Posts: 173
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2003, 07:04:00 AM »
Quote
None of the material or processes or anything about the program or the seminars is secret or mysterious or, in fact, anything that hasn't been written down in books for quite some time.

Can you direct me to an account of a TASKS seminar that:
1. Details exactly what happens.
2. Does not claim that the participants take a vow of secrecy.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Apologia - Serious debate only, please!
« Reply #29 on: December 19, 2003, 08:01:00 AM »
What is different with the facilities under the WWASP umbrella is the approach to family healing.
*********************

WWASP talks about Family Healing and bringing families back together, as do other facilities. I have read numerous accountants in which the parent and child are alienated because the teen stopped "working the program".

If the process is useful and helpful to all parties, then I would think the teen would notice and be a voluntary participant. If the method fails to treat the teen respectfully it's easy to understand that many will never volunarily participate.

How is it helpful or useful to incarcerate the teen and require the parents to write a letter informing the teen that they are on a lovely vacation, enjoying themselves without him/her.

This doesn't imply that all family members "played a role". It implies that the teen is the primary source of conflict and stress in the home and deserves their involuntary isolation and "torture", while the family deserves a break, a vacation.

For an example of how parents are brainwashed to think their child is the problem see this post- excerpts of the Dec issue of The Source:
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... &forum=9&5

Very simply stated, it appears that:
The teen is isolated and has no contact with parents except for an ocassional letter which is censored.
While the teen is being broken down and subjected to extreme control techniques,
The parents are learning how to impliment the techniques, in workshops and/or from other parents. A method that gives an outward appearance of better communication and negotiation, yet when closely analyzed proves to be just a more covert form of manipulation/ coercion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700