Author Topic: Here is my take on the subject.  (Read 7486 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #60 on: December 16, 2003, 09:37:00 PM »
Quote
Let me guess? FROG posting as anon???

Actually no, it wasn't me. (Just got online.) Sounds like me though...Hey! I have imitators!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #61 on: December 16, 2003, 09:54:00 PM »
PS - Eegads! Would it be too much to ask for someone to fix page 6 of this thread? Carey, you could do it by editing that quote tag...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #62 on: December 16, 2003, 10:06:00 PM »
Quote
Yes Carey was a member until she could see that what was going on was wrong.

Carey, please don't refer to yourself in the third person. I've talked to you before about this...Does the name Bob Dole ring a bell?

And please fix that page. It's rather hard on the eyes.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #63 on: December 17, 2003, 09:14:00 AM »
a legend in your own mind carey!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #64 on: December 17, 2003, 09:28:00 AM »
Quote
On 2003-12-16 17:14:00, Carey wrote:

"
Quote
You were not exploited by the trekkers.

You particiapted by choice. We did not exploit you.



Christine, I suppose the same could be said about you.  You were not exploited by WWASP, you participated in the placement of your child in their program by choice.  They did not exploit you.

"


She also didn't take $12,500 ho!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #65 on: December 17, 2003, 11:59:00 AM »
Quote
On 2003-12-16 16:07:00, Carey wrote:


Yes they are. You wish they weren't but they are. The proof is in the emails.



How much of those emails are public record? I understand that the judge asked for copies with some names dedacted to protect the innocent. Would that edited material, then, become part of the public record?

Here's my theory. Trekkers started out with good intentions and reasonable discretion for the purpose of getting the word out on abusive programs. Sue came along sincerely wishing to help in that effort, then had a relapse of chronic higher purpose disease. I want to know if I'm right or not.

Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following
pages, are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them
general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong,
gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises
at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom.  But the
tumult soon subsides.  Time makes more converts than reason.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679433147/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'>Thomas Paine, Common Sense

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #66 on: December 17, 2003, 12:03:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-17 06:28:00, Anonymous wrote:


She also didn't take $12,500 ho!"


No, apparently she was too busy reaching for the $300k

I know that our bodies were made to thrive only in pure air, and the scenes in which pure air is found.
-- John Muir

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #67 on: December 17, 2003, 12:06:00 PM »
Ginger, Christine got $300,000?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #68 on: December 17, 2003, 12:08:00 PM »
Quote
Christine got $300,000?

Who the hell's Christine?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #69 on: December 17, 2003, 12:09:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-12-17 09:06:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Ginger, Christine got $300,000?"


Sorry, missed that. Thought we were still talking about Sue.

Until God Himself arrives to ENFORCE His will, I will systematically reject all offers by human beings to do so.
 

--Sam

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #70 on: December 17, 2003, 12:10:00 PM »
Christine, I suppose the same could be said about you. You were not exploited by WWASP, you participated in the placement of your child in their program by choice. They did not exploit you

==============================

This is where I found the $300,000 comment.  I was just wondering seriously, if Ginger meant Christine got $300,00 and who she was or is.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #71 on: December 17, 2003, 12:12:00 PM »
OK

Well Ginger just killed two birds with one stone and answered both of our questions.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #72 on: December 17, 2003, 12:13:00 PM »
It's tough to keep all of these pay-offs straight!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #73 on: December 17, 2003, 12:23:00 PM »
And I don't know who Christine is. I gather she's a former WWASP/PURE parent. I hope she and her kid are both able to shake it off without too much permanent harm.

All we ask is to be let alone.
-- Jefferson Davis (1808-1889): First Message to the Confederate Congress, March,1861.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Here is my take on the subject.
« Reply #74 on: December 18, 2003, 02:26:00 AM »
Ginger, sounds to me like the Trekkers had the best of intentions but got messed up when they invited the fox (PURE) into the hen house.

 :grin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »