Author Topic: Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill  (Read 2030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill
« on: November 16, 2011, 12:54:29 PM »
The Patriot Ledger
Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill

Canton school fights limits on aversive therapy on two fronts

By Taylor Bigler
Patriot Ledger Washington bureau

Posted Oct 20, 2011 @ 11:20 PM
Last update Oct 20, 2011 @ 11:22 PM


WASHINGTON — As the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton gears up to oppose new state regulations that limit the use of controversial shock treatment, the school is also covering its bases in Washington.

So far this year, the Judge Rotenberg Center has paid $16,500 to Malkin & Ross, a New York-based lobbying firm, according to recent lobbying reports filed with the secretary of the Senate.

According to the reports, the school paid the firm to lobby on its behalf on matters regarding matters in the House and the Senate. The center has paid the firm $5,500 in each quarter of this year.

The Judge Rotenberg Center paid a combined $111,000 to Malkin & Ross and the international law firm of Bracewell & Giuliani, LLC, the law firm of former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, last year.

A bill filed by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., now the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, would ban the use of physical restraint and seclusion in schools. The bill is co-sponsored by 27 Democrats, including Rep. John Tierney, D-Salem, and one Republican.

In the last session of Congress, Miller, who was then chairman of the committee, sponsored the same legislation. The bill passed the House but died in the Senate.

With the House now in Republican hands and few Republicans backing the bill, it is unlikely to make it to the House floor this time.

“Chairman Kline has long-standing concerns with imposing a federal solution that fails to take into account the proactive initiatives being undertaken at the state and local level,” said Jennifer Allen, a spokeswoman for the current committee chairman, Rep. John Kline, R-Minn.

Miller’s office cited a U.S. Government Accountability Office report as reason for filing the legislation. The report found that hundreds of students had been injured, or in some cases died, due to misuse of restraint or seclusion in schools.

Melissa Salamanowitz, a spokeswoman for Democrats on the committee, said in a statement: “This bill both protects students from abuse and provides training for teachers on effective and appropriate discipline practices. … It's disgraceful but not surprising that the Judge Rotenberg Center would rather that no regulations exist to protect students in schools.”

In a telephone interview, Michael Flammia, a Boston-based attorney for the Judge Rotenberg Center, said, “The Judge Rotenberg Center and a number of other schools lobbied against this bill (last session), and in fact, the bill was not passed.

“It would have put children at risk and at harm,” he said. “It would not allow for restraint when a student is engaging in self-aggressive behavior.”

New regulations from the state Department of Developmental Services will go into effect Oct. 30. The Patriot Ledger reported that the school is planning to file a complaint claiming that the regulations violate a 1987 court order allowing the school to use so-called aversion therapy, which includes shock treatments.

The center uses behavioral modification techniques to curb severely aggressive behavior among developmentally disabled students who are in danger of injuring themselves or others. It is the only school in the country to regularly administer electric-shock treatment to modify the behavior of students.

Gov. Deval Patrick issued an executive order last summer that would ban the use of aversion therapy on new students, after years of stalemate in the Legislature.

Under the new regulations, about 75 students who previously received the therapy would still be allowed to receive the treatment, but the practice would be banned for incoming students.


Copyright 2011 The Patriot Ledger.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
JRC lobbies against seclusion and restraint bill
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2011, 01:16:02 PM »
The autism blog Left Brain/Right Brain discusses the above article:

-------------- • -------------- • --------------

LBRB
Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies against seclusion and restraint bill

14 Nov 2011
Sullivan


The Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) is a special needs school which employs controversial behavior modification techiniques, including electric shock. The JRC has been the focus of much criticism for this practice, which is illegal in many (possibly most) states. Even its home state of Massachusetts has made, and continues to make, efforts to curb this practice.

In Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill, the Canton Journal (a local newspaper for the JRC) notes that the JRC is lobbying to stop state legislation and federal legislation:

    As the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton gears up to oppose new state regulations that limit the use of controversial shock treatment, the school is also covering its bases in Washington.

    So far this year, the Judge Rotenberg Center has paid $16,500 to Malkin & Ross, a New York-based lobbying firm, according to recent lobbying reports filed with the secretary of the Senate.
[/size]
This lobbying effort includes targeting a seclusion and restraint bill:

    A bill filed by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., now the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, would ban the use of physical restraint and seclusion in schools. The bill is co-sponsored by 27 Democrats, including Rep. John Tierney, D-Salem, and one Republican.
[/size]
Seclusion and restraint legislation has been a major focus of autism organizations as diverse as the National Autism Association and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network.

The Miller seclusion and restraint bill, House Resolution 1381, includes language calling for children to have the right to be "Free from physical or mental abuse, aversive behavioral interventions that compromise health and safety..."

    (2) Behavioral interventions for children must promote the right of all children to be treated with dignity. All children have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse, aversive behavioral interventions that compromise health and safety, and any physical restraint or seclusion imposed solely for purposes of discipline or convenience.
[/size]
and specifically call for the prohibition of restraints and aversives that "compromise health and safety":

    (1) School personnel shall be prohibited from imposing on any student the following:

      (A) Mechanical restraints.
      (B) Chemical restraints.
      (C) Physical restraint or physical escort that restricts breathing.
      (D) Aversive behavioral interventions that compromise health and safety.
[/size]
I guess rather than argue that their methods do not "compromise health and safety", JRC would prefer to quash this bill. Unfortunately, JRC may get their wish. H.R. 1381 appears to be stalled, with no actions taken since it was referred to committee in March.


# # #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
The Combine
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2011, 01:53:49 PM »
May get their wish, eh?

Seems most of what you get is bad news in regard to these places.

The whole is only as good as the sum of its parts. When the reality is that the rotten folks tend to gravitate to these places precisely because they know there will be ample opportunity to abuse people (especially kids), it is difficult to think that anything short of complete annihilation will do anything to improve anything behind the doors of so many programs across this nation and around the world. As we all know, money writes the diagnosis. There is undoubtedly MONEY behind WHY these places are the way they are, despite any efforts on behalf of any group of people to improve and regulate. In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, Chief Bromden refers to it as The Combine. The machine relentlessly pushing the institution on his people. Denying its existence only occludes the harsh realization...but don't take MY word for it, go read the Thought Reform forum on here, and maybe some of the other ones, and get back to me...

  :karma:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2011, 10:27:40 AM »
Quote from: "Froderik"
As we all know, money writes the diagnosis. There is undoubtedly MONEY behind WHY these places are the way they are, despite any efforts on behalf of any group of people to improve and regulate.
It is phenomenal how much money JRC spends on lobbying. It makes ya wonder just how much they spend on less trackable means of influencing political as well as public opinion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2011, 10:37:48 AM »
Quote from: "Ursus"
Quote from: "Froderik"
As we all know, money writes the diagnosis. There is undoubtedly MONEY behind WHY these places are the way they are, despite any efforts on behalf of any group of people to improve and regulate.
It is phenomenal how much money JRC spends on lobbying. It makes ya wonder just how much they spend on less trackable means of influencing political as well as public opinion.

With people like them, it's a good idea to assume the worst and go from there.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Comments: "Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies against ... bill"
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2011, 11:24:37 AM »
Comments left for the above blog entry, "Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies against seclusion and restraint bill" (by Sullivan, 4 Nov 2011, Left Brain/Right Brain):


Kate Gladstone · November 14th, 2011 18:53:47
    The Judge Rotenberg Center is now legally barred from zapping new admissions —  
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/showthr ... ?tid=23503 ...
However, the existing population (which includes people from age 5 into middle age at least) will continue to receive this form of punishment.[/list]
Victoria Gillen · November 14th, 2011 18:58:36
    $16,500 for lobbying? Where did that come from, I wonder? The exec director made ca. $400K in salary and benefits, and their legal bills must be tremendous... so, perhaps a lot of money is saved when extreme aversives are used? or should the school lose their not-for-profit status? When my son was recommended for residential placement JRC sent a "sales team" to my house – several hundred miles away! Their presentation left me thinking about Donkey Island (from Disney's Pinocchio)... prizes, fun, and a very dark reality.
Sullivan · November 14th, 2011 19:51:16
    Kate Gladstone,

    thanks for that! I hadn't seen it. The ASAN letter is now up as a blog post here.


# #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Judge Rotenberg Center lobbies D.C. against bill
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2011, 11:31:59 AM »
From the above comments:
Quote
Kate Gladstone · November 14th, 2011 18:53:47
    The Judge Rotenberg Center is now legally barred from zapping new admissions —  
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/showthr ... ?tid=23503 ...
However, the existing population (which includes people from age 5 into middle age at least) will continue to receive this form of punishment.[/list]
See also this thread on fornits:

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------