Good idea ‘cause here’s what I would’ve said:
@Who Parody who would presume to decide that what’s called for here is to subject participants to antagonism, because…what? You’ve decided that we the sheeple would be lost without provocations? Thanks for thinking that all this forum needs is to antagonize the participants on threads to incite us to whatever potential it is you feel this forum lacks w/out your antics. But hey the ends justify the means right?
Thinking that what it takes to get genuine people rallied is to bait them or derail whatever interests they would’ve been addressing by causing them to counter or to have to detour around you is simply a fucking derailing inauthentic gimmick and a pretty goddamned condescending one at that (no matter if well intentioned). @ wh00 ever the hell concocted this 0/0 idea, FAIL.
Much like your predecessor (or previous incarnation or whatever) you are (or at least your purpose in this role is) an absolute fucking farce. 'Sorry about all the seriously misguided effort you’ve put into this protracted routine of basically interjecting on threads with an elaborate (A whole front page of your 00 bits yesterday... really?) regurgitation replay of what is simply derisive, dismissive crap and Fuck you for that. Moderate this anyone who so chooses. The fuck you stands regardless of where it lands.
Well, that’s what I would’ve said, but yeah you’re right probably best just to ignore it. :lala:
Edit Added: And Duh, yes, (as -more than is credited- many posters here do) I do get that there is some considerable value in anyone weighing the antipodal position in discussions, but to assume the role of devil’s advocate here in a cartoonish incarnation such as this is somehow necessary is patently insulting to everyone!
And Edited: damn it’s like I’m typing w/ mittens again!
Going back to bed now.