Author Topic: Lon on Scarcity  (Read 1443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Lon on Scarcity
« on: November 03, 2003, 07:44:00 PM »
Need a good laugh? Here we go- Lon attempts to justify the deprivation so common to TBSs/RTCs/WPs, as a form of therapy, but inadvertently reveals their true MO. Instill fear by employing the Scarcity philosophy. Scarcity of food; sleep; genuine relationships; contact with the outside world, parents, siblings; privacy; individual identity and thought. Basically a scarcity of love, proper care, and respect.  Lon wins the Deception award of the week, hands down.

http://www.strugglingteens.com/archives ... rcity.html

SCARCITY FACTOR
By Lon Woodbury
Every successful emotional growth or therapeutic school or program uses scarcity as an important tool. This is not deprivation of basic needs like food, water or shelter; that kind of scarcity usually backfires and creates fear, resentment and what is called "an underground."  An underground is where students reluctantly do only what they have to in order to just get by, and there is usually no positive change in their thinking. Instead, I have in mind a scarcity factor where beyond the necessities, students must earn what they receive. If they do not make any extra effort, they get only the basics. It is up to each student to decide what he or she wants badly enough to work for. Actually, virtually the whole discipline of economics is based on the existence of scarcity in the real world.

When the structure of a school or program is well constructed, this scarcity factor extends to relationships with peers. That is, in a well-structured school or program, the students even find it difficult to make ongoing friendships until they can learn how to make them based on trust, honesty and respect. Easy friendships are not satisfying, because they are usually based on a lowest common denominator, like drugs, hanging out, etc. These easy friendships demand little, but provide little in return. However, when a child makes the effort to earn respect from peers through honesty, responsibility and the like, the resulting friendships are much more satisfying, and well worth the effort. Even when making good friends, the scarcity factor applies, just like it does in the adult world in which the students eventually must enter.

Children must be raised with enough scarcity in their lives to learn the lesson that they have to work for what they want. If given "stuff" freely, without learning the lessons of work and earning their own way, we often get children who feel they are entitled to all the good things in life. Without learning this lesson about the scarcity factor, their future is problematic. Adults who have successfully supported themselves or supported and raised a family, know that it doesn't come about without a lot of hard work. Trying to raise and support a family by assuming it just automatically happens is a formula for great disappointment, and often disaster. The scarcity factor applies in family building also.

The scarcity factor is an important consideration for parents to keep in mind for their children. The modern tendency for parents to give their children "all the material advantages" very well could be a major explanation why so many teens are not emotionally capable of handling the responsibility of college, or work, at least initially. We see many young adults with a turbulent start to their adulthood as they learn the hard way that the world does not consider it owes them anything. The turmoil comes from the young person having no clue about the scarcity factor that requires earning something by working for it.

It can be argued that this need for a child to learn how to deal with scarcity as part of growing up is in our genes. Except in the late 20th and early 21st century in industrialized countries, human groups have lived consistently on the verge of disaster. There was no room for slackers and every person in the community had to pull his or her own weight. Often, the consequence for someone who broke the rules, or didn't contribute to the tribe's survival, was extremely harsh by today's standards. The human race evolved under conditions of constant scarcity and out of necessity everyone was required to learn the vital lesson that they had to work to contribute for survival.

It doesn't make sense that that the human trait so universally required in the past, no longer applies. Much more sensible is the suggestion that even in times like our current abundance, for emotional health, a person still has to learn to earn what they get by struggling with scarcity. Besides, for most adults, the world still enforces that need to work for what you get, though not as obviously as in the situation of a wandering tribal group subsisting off the land. Despite the complexity of modern civilization, the scarcity factor is still as important as ever.

A quality school or program recognizes it is an important part of the student's learning to deal with scarcity. Wise parents would do the same when raising their own children, not being too generous about providing cars, personal phones, credit cards, or full college expenses with little effort spent by the child to earn this abundance.

Remembering the scarcity factor is important in order for a school or program to be successful with teens. And, parents who want to give their child a true advantage would do well to provide good lessons about the scarcity factor for their children.

On Scarcity and Economics
http://www.yesmagazine.org/2Money/Lietaer.html
Excerpts:
The question I have been asking is very simple: What are the shadows of the Great Mother archetype? I'm proposing that these shadows are greed and fear of scarcity. So it should come as no surprise that in Victorian times - at the apex of the repression of the Great Mother - a Scottish schoolmaster named Adam Smith noticed a lot of greed and scarcity around him and assumed that was how all "civilized" societies worked. Smith, as you know, created modern economics, which can be defined as a way of allocating scarce resources through the mechanism of individual, personal greed.

If a society is afraid of scarcity, it will actually create an environment in which it manifests well-grounded reasons to live in fear of scarcity. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy!
 Also, we have been living for a long time under the belief that we need to create scarcity to create value. Although that is valid in some material domains, we extrapolate it to other domains where it may not be valid. For example, there's nothing to prevent us from freely distributing information. The marginal cost of information today is practically nil. Nevertheless, we invent copyrights and patents in an attempt to keep it scarce.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Lon on Scarcity
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2003, 10:01:00 PM »
Who is this Lon Woodbury guy?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Lon on Scarcity
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2003, 02:36:00 AM »
Lon claims to be an educational consultant. He runs a site where he advertises and "reviews" (never a negative word said) programs including WWASP.

In reality Lon is an industry mouthpiece and earns a living advertising and recomending dangerous and abusive programs by giving them the aura of legitimacy.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Lon on Scarcity
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2003, 09:03:00 AM »
Maybe someone should recommend a dangerous and abusive program to him if he doesn't shut the fuck up.  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Lon on Scarcity
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2003, 02:09:00 PM »
Every cloud has a silver lining. Art Barker lost his federal funding and political support because, in my view, he was just that much of a megalomaniac that he couldn't bear to bend to their good political and legal advice. He bought into his own schtick, hook, line and sinker and made the fatal error of trying to justify his philosophy rather than have enough sense to keep it on the QT. I think these folks are making the same mistake.

Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By  any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care.
http://www.masscann.org/quotes.htm' target='_new'>Administrative Law Judge, Francis Young,  DOJ/DEA

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline kaydeejaded

  • Posts: 719
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Lon on Scarcity
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2003, 03:51:00 PM »
wow he showed his hand nicely there.

               The body of
        Benjamin Franklin, printer,
      (Like the cover of an old book,
            Its contents worn out,
    And scripts of it's lettering and gilding)
       Lies Here, food for worms!
     Yet the work itself shall not be lost,
For it will, as he believed, appear once more
                 In a new
         And more beautiful edition,
          Corrected and amended
                By it's Author!

Epitaph for himself.

--Benjamin Franklin 1706-1790

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
or those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who don\'t, none will do