General Interest > Feed Your Head
NATSAP members dropping out
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---
I did get Whooter banned for a week just a few weeks ago, BTW.
--- End quote ---
Well then, you can die a satisfied man, because your life truly had meaning. You are fucking insane, just like all the other losers who get trapped in Whooter's net. Tha'ts right, Whooter is trolling you and has you in his net. He is in control of you, not the other way around. You know what? I bet Whooter is laughing at you right now.
--- End quote ---
Yep
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---Sure, he's a troll and annoying sometimes.
--- End quote ---
annoying all times [quote="Guest"But people like you and Anne Bonney who feed trolls , day after fucking day, are the worst. Ban yourslef from fornits, do us all a favor![/quote] Woah there. Going too far now
Dysfunction Junction:
He's not laughing. Just look how he's acting out. It's actually Whooter who has blown a gasket, is out of control and is a compulsive poster. I like to use his sickness to bring attention to topics I'd like to be viewed and also to help those topics climb in search engine rankings. He's a useful idiot. All of the good posts and discussion are in the first few pages and then Whooter's rage and insecurity keep the thread on top as he posts compulsively. If he fucks up the thread right away, I report it to moderators so they clean it up and then when the thread has run its course, but isn't easily searchable,
I get Whooter to keep it at the top and improve its rankings. It's a system I like to use.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---I think anyone who has read my posts know that I dont view things in black and white. I can see typically see both sides of an argument. NATSAP can be considered a little weak without being viewed as useless. I am able to make that distinction but in your post above you were not able to separate that out.
--- End quote ---
:roflmao: :roflmao:
Anonymous:
If whooter is so integral to your annoying system then why do you want him banned? Can;t you come up with a better system than keeping stupid troll feeding threads at the top?
Dysfunction Junction:
--- Quote from: "Family Light" ---If Ethics Committees were to be assigned the task of investigating complaints, looking into situations their own members became aware of and communicate informally, then gathering and presenting evidence to a different body that is impartial to judge the situation, we believe that the compliance with the standards would be vastly enhanced. We believe that this approach would close the gap between what is on paper in well written ethics statements, and what actually occurs, would be narrowed.
We are aware of specific noncompliance in both NATSAP and IECA that are in addition to specific concerns reported on this website. We don’t enter formal complaints where we lack evidence that we can present without breaking confidentiality and without risking a complex legal entanglement. Like most people, we are reluctant to take on the role of prosecutor. We believe the alleged standards of both NATSAP and IECA would be far more credible if these organizations would supply the investigative body and the prosecutor and not just the tribunal.
--- End quote ---
NATSAP is basically useless, even according to EdCons.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version