You referred to me as John Reuben and claimed you attended HLA for more than 3 weeks. Thats two
RobertBruce- 2 Lies
Whooter/TheWho- 0 Lies
Remember Bruce, first one to three lies loses. If you lie about the above score then you automatically lose.
...
Whooter, Whooter, Whooter. What did we say about loop holes? Just because you're losing doesn't mean you have to be a sore loser. If you look back on the original challenge you can see the lies to be discussed are lies told about the offended party, not about yourself. See:
So here's my challenge to you Whooter: Present the lies you claim have been told about you. If I had any direct involvement either through making the claim myself, or perpetuating it, I will do one of two things; either present evidence to back up the claim, or admit it was a lie. For every claim you present you must answer for one of your own.
You were given an opportunity to give input on rules and you declined to do so. It's too late now. So then if you would like to issue a claim regarding my comments concerning you being John Reuben, then I would either have to provide evidence (happy to do so), or admit it was a lie. I then can present you with your claim that I was at HLA for three weeks and you must either provide evidence, or admit it was a lie. The burden of proof is always on whoever originated the claim about the other to begin with.
Furthermore your current tally regarding score is wrong on both counts. You have not proven me to lie about anything, and you forgot to include the fact that you already have one proven lie against you. You lied when you claimed no HIPPA violation ever occured involving you and an HLA staff member.
Play the game correctly Whooter or forefit and pay the money to charity. You gave me your assurances that you would be civil during this period. I hope you won't disappoint me.