It seems many here agree that Survivors lie. So moving past the question of "If they lie" for a minute. We are starting to see many people here blame the programs for their dishonest behavior which touches upon the issue of "Why the abused lie".
...
Danny Benisson is not a survivor. Nobody remembers him from the program. This thread that he most likely started is simply the action of a provocateur seeking to manufacture a "survivor" to admit to lying (and picking others who have "admitted" to lying) when no other valid examples have ever been found. Why the abused lie, again, is a loaded question like one of Whooter's and should not be answered. DO the abused lie is the question that should be asked, and proof should be demanded because so far all you people (program apologists) such as Heretik, his identical IP twin DannyB, and Whooter can do is manufacture evidence, quote people out of context, and make up imaginary survivor friends who will 'admit' to lying. Among other things, i'm calling bullshit on the OP's "lied, embellished or fabricated. I have met survivors who have done one of the three if not all because they wanted there story to be heard".
Oh? You want legitimate discussion? I'm sure you do /sarcasm.
There is no need for survivors to "embellish," the truth is bad enough as it is....and ftr, I have no respect for a survivor who makes shit up, whatever their intention.
Exactly. If anything survivors would have to tone things down to be believed. As I understand it, Over the GW was like that in that respect. Who the hell would exaggerate. It's things like this which cause me to doubt Heretik was actually a survivor in a program.