Author Topic: Is fornits better now that it's moderated? (Read 12986 times)

Che Gookin · « **Reply #90 on:** October 01, 2010, 05:59:39 PM »

I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:

Whooter · « **Reply #91 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:02:02 PM »

Quote from: "Botched Programming"

I need not explain myself to you..Would be like casting pearls before a swine...You would only try to ridacule anything that I would say where as another survivor would understand...

So, okay, just for grins lets assume it is not the Sock-puppetry. The only other reason is that you need to have the ability to spew hatred upon those who disagree with you and attack them versus exchanging ideas. Do you really need to outnumber the other person in order to communicate with them? Why the gang mentality then?

Why not be happy with a forum which accepts everyone equally and doesn't hold one opinion above the other?

...

Ursus · « **Reply #92 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:53:13 PM »

Quote from: "Che Gookin"

I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:

:rofl: :rofl:
Oh, I'd wager that Whooter and his sock puppets are probably responsible for most of the pro-moderation votes.

Maximilian · « **Reply #93 on:** October 01, 2010, 08:13:42 PM »

We all know there is not 23 individual posters that come here (more proof programs are safe). We definitely got some voter fraud going on here. I am going to have to request an intervention by the panel of moderators to look into voter corruption and see what is going on here.

Whooter · « **Reply #94 on:** October 01, 2010, 08:24:59 PM »

Quote from: "Ursus"

Quote from: "Che Gookin"
I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:
:rofl: :rofl:
Oh, I'd wager that Whooter and his sock puppets are probably responsible for most of the pro-moderation votes.

Come on Ursus, there are 10 no's. We all know that that only ones who would be aginst sock-puppetry would be Samara, Botched,PODKs, Trolling Dysfuntion and Bruce. Thats 5 and you are against it from what I have read (but I cannot figure out why).. So that is 6.

Who else that you know of would support to continue the sock-puppet forum? Not anyone. so they must have voted twice.

so that actually makes it 12 to 5.

...

Ursus · « **Reply #95 on:** October 01, 2010, 08:52:56 PM »

Quote from: "Whooter"

Quote from: "Ursus"
Quote from: "Che Gookin"
I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:
:rofl: :rofl:
Oh, I'd wager that Whooter and his sock puppets are probably responsible for most of the pro-moderation votes.
Come on Ursus, there are 10 no's. We all know that that only ones who would be aginst sock-puppetry would be Samara, Botched,PODKs, Trolling Dysfuntion and Bruce. Thats 5 and you are against it from what I have read (but I cannot figure out why).. So that is 6.

Who else that you know of would support to continue the sock-puppet forum? Not anyone. so they must have voted twice.

so that actually makes it 12 to 5.

What you should be thinking about is the anti-censorship and anti-banning crowd, which is not insignificant, even given the substantial arsenal of puppets at your fingertips...

Whooter · « **Reply #96 on:** October 01, 2010, 09:13:24 PM »

Quote from: "Ursus"

Quote from: "Whooter"
Quote from: "Ursus"
Quote from: "Che Gookin"
I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:
:rofl: :rofl:
Oh, I'd wager that Whooter and his sock puppets are probably responsible for most of the pro-moderation votes.
Come on Ursus, there are 10 no's. We all know that that only ones who would be aginst sock-puppetry would be Samara, Botched,PODKs, Trolling Dysfuntion and Bruce. Thats 5 and you are against it from what I have read (but I cannot figure out why).. So that is 6.

Who else that you know of would support to continue the sock-puppet forum? Not anyone. so they must have voted twice.

so that actually makes it 12 to 5.
What you should be thinking about is the anti-censorship and anti-banning crowd, which is not insignificant, even given the substantial arsenal of puppets at your fingertips...

Hmmm... Good point, I could organize my Sockpuppets and tip the scales!! Not that it makes any difference anyway. But that is just what you want me to do so that I would break the rules and get banned by Psy. Nice try, but I will stick to my single vote for now.

...

none-ya · « **Reply #97 on:** October 01, 2010, 10:27:00 PM »

I don't see any point to voting. You can still come here and spew any kind of nonsense you want. What has really changed,anything?

Whooter · « **Reply #98 on:** October 02, 2010, 07:37:05 AM »

Quote from: "none-ya"

I don't see any point to voting. You can still come here and spew any kind of nonsense you want. What has really changed,anything?

Exactly, I have been scratching my head as to why anyone would be against the change. Why do so many people want the sock-puppets and personal attacks back again. Cant Samara, Botched and the rest live without multiple aliases and attacking people to get their point across?

People have voted against it but were never honest enough to say why? Does anyone else find it strange?

...

Froderik · « **Reply #99 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:22:31 PM »

Quote from: "Che Gookin"

I've voted numerous times for both yes and no. :twofinger:

:rofl:

none-ya · « **Reply #100 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:29:29 PM »

Quote from: "Maximilian"

We all know there is not 23 individual posters that come here (more proof programs are safe). We definitely got some voter fraud going on here. I am going to have to request an intervention by the panel of moderators to look into voter corruption and see what is going on here.

Yeah, you do that.Let us know how that worked out.

Froderik · « **Reply #101 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:31:51 PM »

Quote from: "none-ya"

Quote from: "Maximilian"
We all know there is not 23 individual posters that come here (more proof programs are safe). We definitely got some voter fraud going on here. I am going to have to request an intervention by the panel of moderators to look into voter corruption and see what is going on here.

Yeah, you do that.Let us know how that worked out.

:roflmao:

Ursus · « **Reply #102 on:** October 14, 2010, 09:54:43 PM »

Maybe it's just me, but there seem to be an awful lot of posts yanked out of threads willy nilly, often ones which are at least partially "on topic," as far as *I* am concerned... It also seems like certain folk are being targeted more than others.

I say this on behalf of posts that I agree with as well as posts that I really do not. It's beginning to feel like Censor City.

Jes' saying... I think this "moderation thing" can easily be taken too far...

none-ya · « **Reply #103 on:** October 14, 2010, 10:00:47 PM »

Quote from: "Ursus"

Maybe it's just me, but there seem to be an awful lot of posts yanked out of threads willy nilly, often ones which are at least partially "on topic," as far as *I* am concerned... It also seems like certain folk are being targeted more than others.

I say this on behalf of posts that I agree with as well as posts that I really do not. It's beginning to feel like Censor City.

Jes' saying... I think this "moderation thing" can easily be taken too far...

Just like my last post

none-ya · « **Reply #104 on:** October 14, 2010, 10:16:51 PM »

Moderation or censoreship? WTF? The new (rookie) sheriff has nothing to do.

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry

Poll

Do you like the new, moderated version of fornits better?