Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
What Type of Kids "Succeeded" in Behrens Study?
Whooter:
Here is another snippet:
Of the 203 female adolescents who completed the YSR at admission and discharge, 90% reported
some degree or amount of symptom reduction. Of that, 48% reported improvement that exceeds
the cut-off for reliable change (>29 raw score points) and 42% reported improvement below the
cut-off for reliable change (<29 raw score points).
Page 9 again:
Residential Treatment Outcome-Study
...
Pile of Dead Kids:
And now he's reduced to throwing out quotes from a "study" that was already thoroughly debunked.
The thing can say whatever it wants. It's not scientific, never was peer reviewed, relied on self-reporting, excluded portions of what would have been the sample, and the promised follow-up was simply never done. If you like, we can throw quotes from the Eddas at you to tell you all about how the world is grown from the tree Yggdrasil. It has exactly as much scientific weight.
Troll Control:
So again Whooter's admitting only 48% success (this is for girls, BTW - only 31% for boys, a similar sample to other research which showed more than double the success rate) while public programs show 60-80% success maintained over the follow up period of a clinical longitudinal study.
This study has no follow up, is not clinical, no control group, no data acquired outside of program walls. Even with all of this data scrubbing and faulty methodology, it's still far less successful than public programs right out of the box, not to mention a year or more out.
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---So again Whooter's admitting only 48% success (this is for girls, BTW - only 31% for boys, a similar sample to other research which showed more than double the success rate) while public programs show 60-80% success maintained over the follow up period of a clinical longitudinal study.
This study has no follow up, is not clinical, no control group, no data acquired outside of program walls. Even with all of this data scrubbing and faulty methodology, it's still far less successful than public programs right out of the box, not to mention a year or more out.
--- End quote ---
Hmmmm.......Combining these criteria, 78% of adolescent females
reported a change in symptoms that was consistent with recovery and reliable change.
Residential Treatment Outcome-Study
...
Pile of shit:
Whooter you're an ed con. WOW!!! I didn't know that! How many children are you responsible for placing in programs?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version