Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
What Type of Kids "Succeeded" in Behrens Study?
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---Maybe so, but your calling an experimental group a "control group" highlights your ignorance on the topic of studies and shows you can't be relied upon for factual data about them. People should have healthy doubt when reading your posts about studies and how they work.
Well, that, plus this.
--- End quote ---
Ha,Ha,Ha sorry to put your nose out of joint, DJ... up comes the fiduciary post!! lol
You do have a difficult time discussing these items. If you don't feel it would be an interesting study just say so. There is nothing wrong with disagreement, its healthy and promotes discussion. You dont have to take every position so personally.
Just say you disagree with me.. its okay.
...
Troll Control:
I do disagree with almost everything you say, but I feel it should be pointed out who butters your bread.
Also, you clearly, demonstrably have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to studies. You don't even know the difference between control groups and experimental groups and you were saying last week that regulation on human studies applied to high school exams and not research. You just have no idea.
On top of that, you're in the tank for Aspen. Your compulsiveness and rabidity here show that. You'll do or say anything, regardless of how stupid it is, to cover up Aspen's abuse and the fact that their research is a crock of shit - unpublished, unreviewed, no follow up and Aspen PAID to present it the APA which specifically doesn't endorse presenters.
People should know they're dealing with a sheister when they interact with you. That's all I'm saying. You made this reputation for yourself and you get mad when people point it out. But it's your fault you said and did these things.
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---I do disagree with almost everything you say, but I feel it should be pointed out who butters your bread.
Also, you clearly, demonstrably have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to studies. You don't even know the difference between control groups and experimental groups and you were saying last week that regulation on human studies applied to high school exams and not research. You just have no idea.
On top of that, you're in the tank for Aspen. Your compulsiveness and rabidity here show that. You'll do or say anything, regardless of how stupid it is, to cover up Aspen's abuse and the fact that their research is a crock of shit - unpublished, unreviewed, no follow up and Aspen PAID to present it the APA which specifically doesn't endorse presenters.
People should know they're dealing with a sheister when they interact with you. That's all I'm saying. You made this reputation for yourself and you get mad when people point it out. But it's your fault you said and did these things.
--- End quote ---
Wow, calm down, DJ, its just a discussion. You run around accusing me of working for Aspen just because I am defending a study that has been released. lol
You pointed out that you disagree with me and that is okay. You don't need to throw a fit, its unprofessional. Dont take it so hard, you have brought up some valid points. Like where is the follow-up study? That was a good point that you brought up and worth discussing but you dont have to get mad at me over it. I dont have control over whether the studies are released or not and I am willing to discuss the possible reason with you.
Lets get back on topic if you like and talk about the type of kids that succeeded in this study.
...
Pile of Dead Kids:
You know Whooter's getting hammered when he accuses people of "throwing fits". It's just what he does.
Troll Control:
Exactly, Pile. I'm as calm as can be. I have no need to get riled up. Whooter's ricebowl is getting broken so he's desperate to change the subject and make it about me. He's the one who admitted a fiduciary interest in Aspen Education and he gets upset when people point it out. If he didn't want it to come back up, he should have never said it. But he did. And now he can't be believed on subjects like this.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version