I write this for several reasons, but mostly I'm prompted to because of the ongoing, puerile exchange between 'program' and 'not program'.
In all societies, indeed for society to form at all, there is hierarchy. Hierarchy is no more than the search for order, so necessary because life does not thrive in chaos.
A significant difference between 'program' and 'not program' is an in-ability to accept natural hierarchy.ie;
program people seem to uniformly believe themselves superior by virtue of program or dogma participation, and for no other reason. (this is a by -and-large judgement,by no means definitive) not program seem to recognize that natural hierarchies exist, and are the norm, ie; that some people are better at some things and others at other things. having had some experience at command, in different venue, different mission, I've noticed that it's best to allow people to 'sort themselves out' Some men are riflemen, some medics, some miners, some theives. Very few saints in the bunch.
Given a group of men to command, I found that they were themselves the best judge of mission parameters, mission requirement. My job was simply to maintain objective and command and control. If I let 'em and helped 'em, they'd get 'er done. Program people seem not to have this view. They seem idealogy driven and not reality driven. They seem driven by process and not by result.
I think of B.F. Skinner's "Beyond Freedom and Dignity", the difference between a 'pack' ethos and a 'hive' ethos.
As, for me, I'm a redneck and thus a 'pack' animal, and as it's not necessary for me to change, I won't.
J.O.M.