Look, Anne, there is no reason to be rude. This orange paper guy doesnt back up what he says with facts, as you think he does. I just gave you a random example of where he throws out numbers off the top of his head and then continues to build an argument around it. The paper is based on his opinions... it isnt fact based.
If you still believe it is fact then what study support the numbers in this statement of his? Where did these come from?
Even the most ardent true believers who will be honest about it recognize that A.A. and N.A. have at least 90% failure rates. And the real numbers are more like 95% or 98% or 100% failure rates. It depends on who is doing the counting, how they are counting, and what they are counting or measuring.
....