Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
Summary: Devastating Indictment of TheWho
Anonymous:
FUCK
Troll Control:
*bump* For educational purposes.
Whooter:
So lets see where we stand with our anonymous guest:
I challenged him to go through each item on his list... lets take a look:
Our anonymous guest said :Link
“you both took a trip to Chicago to meet with Lon Woodbury, Martha Kolbe and a host of other industry bogeymen just before STICC was launched.”
....... Fact: STICC was launched in April of 2004
....... Fact: My post places me in Chicago January of 2007.
Conclusion: Our anonymous guest was off by 3 years.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next our anonymous guest said: Link
I also have a little PM exchange between you and me (using the login "Concerned Parent"). I wrote you a PM asking for info on ASR and you wrote me back to contact you privately at your email address:
PM Between TheWho and Concerned Parent from 2007 wrote:
Re: Is ASR a good program?
Sent: Fri Jun 06, 2007 1:07 pm
From: TheWho
To: Concerned Parent
Personally I think ASR is a good program. It worked for our family. My kid was there
when Dave Marcus wrote his book based on the kids in the program and they got back on
track and matured. I have been to the campus many times and think if it's a good fit
for your son that you shouldn't worry about it. Don't trust what you read on this site
because the members here are all anti-program and have an agenda to discredit all
programs. If you want to contact me outside fornits I can help you get in contact with
someone who can help you make the right decision. You can email me at
onekidatatime@yahoo.com. Good luck and I hope it all works out for you.
Going to deny this as well? I never called you out on it before, but I held onto it just in case you wanted to deny later that you said it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We all asked that the PM be authenticated, Psy offered to do the work. But our anonymous guest declined. I wonder why?
Can anyone guess why they wouldn’t want the PM authorized?
Troll Control:
Since when does anyone need to have their PMs "authorized"? That's a stupid statement from a stupid person. I don't see how December 2006 to January 2007 is three years. Funny math there, Whooter! Why don't you have your personal information "authorized"?
Thanks for reposting your PM though, even if youdidn't have it "authorized." at least now everyone can see you give out Joh Reuben's email address while soliciting business. Weird how you two have the same email address, huh? i think we all see what's going on here, John, er, Whooter.
Troll Control:
Funny, I just read through this whole thread and nowhere, ever, does it say anything about '2004" anywhere. Whooter made that part up. Read for yourself. Start at the top and read through. IT'S NOT THERE. I think he snagged an anon quote from another thread and tried to pass it off as the OPs assertion, which it clearly isn't. Whooter is just lying about it as usual.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version