Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
Ellen Behren's Industry Study Funded by AEG
elangraduate:
WHOOTER FUCK YOU!!!
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---
--- Quote ---Of that, 31% reported
improvement that exceeded the 2 standard deviation cut-off for reliable change
--- End quote ---
"Reliable change" here is defined by two SD's above the mean. 31% met that standard. 50% did not meet reliable change standards because they were too near the mean. And this is after the data was scrubbed of in-program failures.
What was the reliable change rate at one year post-program? That would be included in the 2007 follow up. Do you have that for us?
--- End quote ---
Exactly and on a normal curve 2 sigma would equate to 95.5%. 31% of the kids exceeded this mark and the other 50% fell below the 95.5% mark... more towards the norm or center of the curve.
81% saw at least some reduction in symptoms.
...
Troll Control:
With two SD'd being the watermark for reliable change. 50% showed no reliable change, that is, they were "treatment failures." And that's after the data was scrubbed of all kids who didn't do well in the program.
How did that hold up over time, Whooter? What did the 2007 results show?
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---With two SD'd being the watermark for reliable change. 50% showed no reliable change, that is, they were "treatment failures." And that's after the data was scrubbed of all kids who didn't do well in the program.
How did that hold up over time, Whooter? What did the 2007 results show?
--- End quote ---
81% saw at least some reduction in symptoms.
...
Troll Control:
Can you show that data from the follow up? Or are you just making up figures here? I noticed you provided no link.
What you keep quoting is data that was gathered before the kids left the program. What happened at the follow up in 2007?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version