No, my point was specific to SageWalk's founder who admits it's now a dangerous and unsafe place for kids due to Aspen's handling of the business.
And anecdotal evidence from parents and kids doesn't mean anything, scientifically or legally speaking. Scientifically we would require a clinical trial of Aspens methods using a control group and an experimental group in a double-blind setup combined with a long-term follow -up of both groups. This is the only way to assess efficacy, period. There is no other method. To date, Aspen has refused to allow any clinical research.
Secondly, anecdotes can be true, false, or somewhere in the middle, depending on perspective. Therefore, we must rely on the fact-finding of the agency charged with overseeing MBA. It's report indicated wholesale, widespread abuse and neglect along with sexual humiliation of students. An objective, factual report is believable and passes the evidentiary tests that anecdotes simply cannot.
I'm sorry to have to keep reminding you, "Guest" about what facts are and what opinions are, but you seem unable to grasp the difference. Stories of parents and children = opinion. State report of abuse, neglect and sexual humiliation = fact. I hope you now understand the difference between objective facts and subjective opinions.