Now what you're trying to do here JD, is obscure the post related to the AARC staffer who killed the hooker. This man was given charge of vulnerable teens, and there are allegations of violence against AARC clients during their stay in AARC. It is an example of the dangerous situation people are placed in via unregulated unmonitored amateur "recovery" programs. It's important to you that you sidetrack any discussion of this, because every time one of these program is exposed as dangerous, it undermines your position as a program shill, and someone who sacrificed their own child to the industry. But JD, you can't hide this stuff. You can put as many posts as you want up to bury the original information, but it will just get reposted.
theIt combines evil and absurd in a particularly flesh crawling way. Why call TheIt "JD," though? Isn't theit this guy?
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Reuben_J ... 2.aspxJohn Reuben: ZoomInfo Business People Information(March 21, 2007) John David Reuben, Chairman/ Founder of Saving Teens In Crisis Collaborative (STICC), Sudbury, MA, 877-249-1336
(It makes sense. Killing your own kid through paying Academy at Swift River and SUWS to torture him, could make a person as deranged as theWho clearly is. I wonder if his absurd contention that hookers violently assault their exploiters in "far greater numbers" than there are instances of assault on prostitutes comes from a personal transaction with a prostitute gone awry. One can hope.)
Pie in the sky, but have you considered suing theit? Surely recommending a (non existent) facility while pretending to be an AARC insider constitutes fraud of some kind. Seriously. You've a 2 year window, or so. Look into it.
Calling me JD, I think, refers to “John David”. Ajax and another guy named Bruce who also posts here and a few others use it because it gives themselves the impression or the feeling that they know my identity which gives them a leg-up in their own eyes, and the self realized advantage in the conversation which they seek. Having a conversation, sharing information or debating specific issues is not satisfying to them because they are not interested in learning something new or improving themselves. Ajax proved this time and time again, specifically with AARC's Statistical release. They seek to “own” someone (to take from their own vernacular) which takes on a higher importance than the conversation itself to them.
If you follow their posts Ajax13 is in a constant struggle to place himself above all those in AARC by giving them all nicknames which are intended to humiliate them, scarlett letter style. The content and accuracy of his posts are secondary as long as he can ridicule. This seems to be a good release for him.
Bruce is in constant search for someone to harass to try to define his worth her on fornits. He too isn’t really interested in engaging in conversation or the pursuit of gaining knowledge. Since he doesn’t have much experience as a survivor he seeks to fit in by asking repeated stock questions which gives himself the false feeling of being superior. This works for him very well.
…and yourself as well. If you can convince yourself that I killed my wife and kids then you can dismiss my posts and easily feel like you are better than I am which makes you feel good. If it didn’t make you feel good than you would not continue.
All in all I think it is a good thing. The main thing is that it keeps you happy in your false realities and enable to keep the conversation moving along. No harm is done because none of us really know each other and the lap tops can be turned off at the end of the night…. And all is well.
So please don’t take any of it to heart… whether you think I am theit, thewho, John Rueben, Peter Strauss, Alan Newman, etc. The important thing is we are having a great conversation on very important topics and this is going a long way in helping the readers decide about the ever evolving industry.