After reading this:
"Peer staff members are graduates of our program who serve as positive role models for our clients. They share how they use the 12 steps and offer support to help our clients overcome the hardships and struggles of recovery. They also share in the joy of recovery. Peer staff members interact with clients on a daily basis. We strive for one Peer Staff for every ten clients. One of the components that make our program so effective is that we team up Professional Staff (Masters Level Professionals) with Peer Staff (graduates of our program). This combination allows our families to get both the professional and personal perspectives on recovery."
which I read AFTER reading this disclaimer:
"This website is a private collaboration by several graduate parents of Pathway Family Center and is in no way initiated, funded, authorized, or otherwise supported by Pathway Family Center. Content on this site has been compiled through personal experience and observations of the Pathway treatment program, interviews with graduate parents and clients, former staff and current staff of Pathway, and through extensive research and review of information in the public domain. The objective for presentation of this material is to provide truth to the much-distorted and false information found online about Pathway and its life-saving treatment.
James Meyers, graduate parent
William Reynolds, graduate parent"
:timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout:
Now, before I get too far here, it appears to me that these people named "James Meyers graduate parent" and "William Reynolds graduate parent" are not being honest. I mean, if someone were to read that disclaimer and then be convinced that he/she were not reading material that was offered by a person in a managerial position at PFC, then it would be understandable... that is... if they read no further. But, if they were to then read the parts where the authors of the content displayed on this website write things like "our clients", and words like "we", you know, used in the first person type context, they might start to scratch their head and think that they really aren't an idiot and that someone is trying to pull the wool over their eyes. At that point, they may even start to get really mad and then well, who knows what would happen next.
On a lighter note, they should have put that pic of WDTONY up top. :roflmao: :roflmao: Let him go first, you know. Why me? :roflmao:
Who remembers "Smoke In's" ? :roflmao: :rasta: Oh, like that must be a forbidden term.
