RMA/CEDU prided themselves on not having professionals. Not having people with college degrees. Their stated reasons for that pride may have been that they weren't going to use the "normal" procedures and methods of professionals, but personally I think they wanted to avoid the issue of ethics.
It may have also had something to do with
the time period. I think the earlier programs definitely had that anti-psych mindset (despite the fact that they used every single psychological tool for manipulation that they could get their hands on from the Human Potential movement). I've heard it described at Hyde as "all you really need is ...
to care." In fact, I think there was a real
antipathy towards professionals, like they were "too much in their head," and not "real" enough.
Maybe that mindset goes back to program roots which were in the addiction treatment field, where former addicts could be considered to be somewhat on par with those who had done the legwork in academia, since they had the "field experience." That field experience was actually considered
superior, at Hyde, to any bona fide in-depth course of study. Joe Gauld always used to say, "You can't con a con (and you can't kid a kid)." About half the time (according to my memory), he would only say the first part of that quote, lol.
But aside from being able to come up with their own barometer of ethics, I think it also had a lot to do with
founder ego, namely folk who possess an inflated sense of self-importance and destiny. Hey, maybe they were right. After all, here we are, decades later, still wringing our gray matter over it all... I think megalomaniac narcissists like Wasserman really wanted to play God, really had a sick psychological need to play God and, on some level, probably couldn't help themselves from trying to play God. And to be able to control people like they did, they had to be in charge of "the rules," whatever they may have been. An
outside body of expertise would have been able to second-guess or undercut that way too much.
Most professionals have to undergo ethics training, sign statements that they will work ethically and are regulated by others who try and maintain standards of ethics. Some measure of accountability. Whack jobs might get through the cracks, but I think RMA/CEDU were trying to avoid any professionals and subsequently any ethics or oversight. And I think they succeeded.
To renew their license, professionals would need to undergo some kind of regular review by their peers, no? They would be held accountable to some
other body of judgment, not Mel's. My impression is that would not have sat too well with Mel.