Author Topic: why is che allowed back?  (Read 3734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CCM girl 1989

  • Posts: 1308
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #45 on: August 07, 2008, 07:51:50 PM »
And I am also one of the few here that doesn't do the quote thing right!!!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
f you were never in a program, or a parent of a child in a program, then you have no business posting here.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #46 on: August 07, 2008, 08:11:07 PM »
Quote from: "asd"
Quote from: "TROLL BUSTER"
Quote from: "most are trolls,not all"

Do whatever you want, of course, but it did happen

Of course it did NOT.  Strange how only CCM and the who claim to have seen it.  Not too credible in the registered user department.

Go back to posting your porn, asswipe.

You make a lot of incorrect assumptions and your unprovoked abusiveness kinda supports my point. ccm is credible. Castle saw it too, if I'm not mistaken.

Besides, don't you remember, nutso, before you were saying that  that Zen found/posted her info because he was "fighting back" and it was o.k. cause she was too dumb to know how to hide her info.

Try to be more consistent with your bullshit.

Think I'm lying? Ask him to link to his original post. He won't even though up in the bury carcass he announces he's going to edit it, then that he did. He knew where it was then, but not now. How convenient!

nutso? only people from the bronx say nutso.
Castle n Muldoon

someone missing a nutsack nutso?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #47 on: August 07, 2008, 08:34:40 PM »
Quote from: "CCM girl 1989"


Of course it did NOT.  Strange how only CCM and the who claim to have seen it.  Not too credible in the registered user department.

Go back to posting your porn, asswipe.
[/quote]


Oh really, you're saying I'm not credible? Ouch that hurts! LOL!!!!!! The sad thing is, I am one of only a handful of posters registered here on Fornits that is credible. At least in the 3 forums I frequent, and sometimes post in. I've never lied. If I have please enlighten me.



[/quote]

Exactly. In fact zen and his pack of anon, semi-literate hyenas keep changing their story--they're not credible.

 Zen also claims to "bluff" lie a lot. He's now saying knowing your husband's name was a "bluff" so--there's the credibility issue sorted.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #48 on: August 07, 2008, 08:38:58 PM »
Quote from: "FASF"


Speaking of which,  people who out survivors can continue moderating? As you may have heard, it's been mentioned once or twice: zenagent outed ccm.

Ask Zen to link to the original post where he threatened to post ccm's complete info. In the bury the carcass thread, he posts he's going to delete the info he put up about ccm, then he announces he did so, so he knows where it's located.

He won't link because the thread  proves what he did.

Or maybe no one responded to his post, so he deleted it entirely, and it really doesn't exist anymore? I don't know. Anyway...it's kinda disrespectful for him to still be a moderator here, especially of the "safe forum."

...but I guess your feeling is buyer beware, right?

this
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #49 on: August 07, 2008, 08:46:02 PM »
Quote from: "WISHER"
Quote from: "FASF"


Speaking of which,  people who out survivors can continue moderating? As you may have heard, it's been mentioned once or twice: zenagent outed ccm.

Ask Zen to link to the original post where he threatened to post ccm's complete info. In the bury the carcass thread, he posts he's going to delete the info he put up about ccm, then he announces he did so, so he knows where it's located.

He won't link because the thread  proves what he did.

Or maybe no one responded to his post, so he deleted it entirely, and it really doesn't exist anymore? I don't know. Anyway...it's kinda disrespectful for him to still be a moderator here, especially of the "safe forum."

...but I guess your feeling is buyer beware, right?

this

You're reversing the burden of proof on Zen.  It's not up to him to bring evidence against himself.  As it stands, there is no evidence he did anything wrong (and i've looked into it).  If you have proof (which nobody has ever been able to present) that:...

A: Zen posted accurate information about CCM
AND
B: Zen obtained this information through an his position as a moderator (impossible since Zen never had access to IP address info, even if he did it would still require a subpoena.  PMs are inaccessable even to admins, and CCM's personal info was available to a google search (her fault))

... something might be done about it (such as removing his mod status). 

otherwise

SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP
« Last Edit: August 07, 2008, 08:54:52 PM by psy »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #50 on: August 07, 2008, 08:52:52 PM »
It's funny to watch them keep denying it. How many people saw the post and are reading this now and realize how corrupt this forum really is? I saw the discussion take place and saw the whole thing go down. ZenAgent indeed did make the threatening post in question, and then spent a couple days afterwards explaining why he did it. All people have to do is read the thread, and it's obvious how it went down. But people rather bury their head in the sand, than realize they supported someone who hunts down survivors personal information to humiliate them in open forum.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #51 on: August 07, 2008, 08:55:02 PM »
Quote from: "donny darko"
It's funny to watch them keep denying it. How many people saw the post and are reading this now and realize how corrupt this forum really is? I saw the discussion take place and saw the whole thing go down. ZenAgent indeed did make the threatening post in question, and then spent a couple days afterwards explaining why he did it. All people have to do is read the thread, and it's obvious how it went down. But people rather bury their head in the sand, than realize they supported someone who hunts down survivors personal information to humiliate them in open forum.
You're reversing the burden of proof on Zen.  It's not up to him to bring evidence against himself.  As it stands, there is no evidence he did anything wrong (and i've looked into it).  If you have proof (which nobody has ever been able to present) that:...

A: Zen posted accurate information about CCM
AND
B: Zen obtained this information through an his position as a moderator (impossible since Zen never had access to IP address info, even if he did it would still require a subpoena.  PMs are inaccessable even to admins, and CCM's personal info was available to a google search (her fault))

... something might be done about it (such as removing his mod status). 

otherwise

SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #52 on: August 07, 2008, 08:59:00 PM »
Errrr...

So does anyone want to know what wonderful things I've learned reading Sue's book? Just ask.. I'll be happy to discuss it after I stop dry heaving.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #53 on: August 07, 2008, 09:08:52 PM »
Uh, this isn't a court of law where "zen shouldn't bring evidence against himself."

 The thing is, zen said he would go back and edit out ccms' info in the "carcass" thread, so he knows where the original post is:

Quote from: "ZenAgent"

DON'T ask for what you DON'T WANT....I've got as many boundaries as you, who.  Obviously.[…]

Share your "information".

Now I'll honor my end and delete the above.

He also wrote how he edited it “without being asked to,”

 
Quote from: "ZenAgent"
I edited CCM's name out of the post without anyone asking me to do it.


So just ask him to link to it. Then you can find what he had there originally, and if he didn't post anything that will prove it.

He won't do it cause he knows what he wrote...whatever.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline 3xsaSeedling

  • Posts: 469
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #54 on: August 07, 2008, 09:21:44 PM »
Quote from: "psy"


SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP



bump
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Of all the things I\'ve ever lost, I miss my mind the most.
Wait...I found \'IT\'!!    
oh joy

"Fresh baked daily!"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #55 on: August 07, 2008, 09:32:39 PM »
The irony of posting "shut the fuck up" on an internet discussion board is too much.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #56 on: August 07, 2008, 09:53:54 PM »
Quote from: "DFA"

Uh, this isn't a court of law where "zen shouldn't bring evidence against himself."

 The thing is, zen said he would go back and edit out ccms' info in the "carcass" thread, so he knows where the original post is:

Quote from: "ZenAgent"

DON'T ask for what you DON'T WANT....I've got as many boundaries as you, who.  Obviously.[…]

Share your "information".

Now I'll honor my end and delete the above.

He also wrote how he edited it “without being asked to,”

 
Quote from: "ZenAgent"
I edited CCM's name out of the post without anyone asking me to do it.


So just ask him to link to it. Then you can find what he had there originally, and if he didn't post anything that will prove it.

He won't do it cause he knows what he wrote...whatever.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #57 on: August 07, 2008, 09:54:24 PM »
Quote from: "DFA"

Uh, this isn't a court of law where "zen shouldn't bring evidence against himself."

 The thing is, zen said he would go back and edit out ccms' info in the "carcass" thread, so he knows where the original post is:

Quote from: "ZenAgent"

DON'T ask for what you DON'T WANT....I've got as many boundaries as you, who.  Obviously.[…]

Share your "information".

Now I'll honor my end and delete the above.

He also wrote how he edited it “without being asked to,”

 
Quote from: "ZenAgent"
I edited CCM's name out of the post without anyone asking me to do it.


So just ask him to link to it. Then you can find what he had there originally, and if he didn't post anything that will prove it.

He won't do it cause he knows what he wrote...whatever.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #58 on: August 07, 2008, 09:57:11 PM »
Quote from: "psy"
SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP


^^^

THIS
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: why is che allowed back?
« Reply #59 on: August 07, 2008, 10:01:06 PM »
Quote from: "DFF"
Quote from: "DFA"

Uh, this isn't a court of law where "zen shouldn't bring evidence against himself."

 The thing is, zen said he would go back and edit out ccms' info in the "carcass" thread, so he knows where the original post is:

Quote from: "ZenAgent"

DON'T ask for what you DON'T WANT....I've got as many boundaries as you, who.  Obviously.[…]

Share your "information".

Now I'll honor my end and delete the above.

He also wrote how he edited it “without being asked to,”

 
Quote from: "ZenAgent"
I edited CCM's name out of the post without anyone asking me to do it.


So just ask him to link to it. Then you can find what he had there originally, and if he didn't post anything that will prove it.

He won't do it cause he knows what he wrote...whatever.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »