« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: 20,000-50,000  (Read 2262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pitbull Mom

  • Posts: 92
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2007, 01:40:27 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
WOAH!! Look at the first paragraph!

Quote
KING OF PRUSSIA, Pa., Oct. 29 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE: UHS) announced today that its reported net income was $28.9 million, or $.54 per diluted share, during the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $113.9 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, during the comparable prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, reported net income was $130.4 million, or $2.43 per diluted share, as compared to $225.3 million, or $3.89 per diluted share, during the comparable nine-month period in the prior year.

Net income for this quarter dropped 75% from last year! Pure ownage, and hardly the sign of a growing company.


don't be fooled by just looking at net income, you have to look at net revenues and also the deductions that go into that net income line. And don't misinterpret my intentions in posting this information as did the previous poster, I am not happy about these numbers, I am very concerned about the growth in the industry:

Net revenues increased 13% to $1.18 billion during the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $1.04 billion during the third quarter of 2006. Net revenues increased 14% to $3.56 billion during the first nine months of 2007 as compared to $3.13 billion during the comparable nine-month period of 2006.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pitbull Mom

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2007, 01:41:25 PM »
Yup, the extremely small number consisting of... pretty much everything on every forum on this board (excepting, of course, the hopeless arguments with shills), all of Anti-WWASP, all of ISAC, the GAO getting completely flooded by so many allegations of abuse they had to expand their investigations to an entirely new second round, the assorted pissed survivors that keep popping up all over Myspace, Facebook, Wikipedia talk pages...

Oh yeah, that's an extremely small number all right. :roll:

Parents, this man wants control of YOUR children, etc.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #17 on: November 09, 2007, 01:43:23 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Parents, this man wants control of YOUR children, etc.


And they pay extremely well, and thank us everyday for the service we provide. If you are so concerned about abusive programs, why don't you start your own that is safe? You just whine all day and expect things to get done, the world does not work that way.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #18 on: November 09, 2007, 01:43:58 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
WOAH!! Look at the first paragraph!

Quote
KING OF PRUSSIA, Pa., Oct. 29 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Universal Health Services, Inc. (NYSE: UHS) announced today that its reported net income was $28.9 million, or $.54 per diluted share, during the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $113.9 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, during the comparable prior year quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, reported net income was $130.4 million, or $2.43 per diluted share, as compared to $225.3 million, or $3.89 per diluted share, during the comparable nine-month period in the prior year.

Net income for this quarter dropped 75% from last year! Pure ownage, and hardly the sign of a growing company.


Typical information you receive here, always misleading and inaccurate, lets finish the Article shall we?


Here are the facts :

hurricane related expenses,
minority interests and income taxes  etc.

After adjusting for the items discussed above applicable to each period presented, as indicated on the attached Supplemental Schedules, our adjusted net income during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 was $34.1 million, or $.64 per diluted share, as compared to $30.6 million, or $.54 per diluted share, during the third quarter of 2006.

Net revenues increased 13% to $1.18 billion during the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $1.04 billion during the third quarter of 2006.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #19 on: November 09, 2007, 01:54:20 PM »
Quote
Since the items included or excluded from these measures are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance under GAAP, these measures should not be considered to be alternatives to net income as a measure of our operating performance or profitability. Since these measures, as presented, are not determined in accordance with GAAP


El Oh the fucking El.

How would you like your books, sautee'd, fried, or boiled?

I try to think of other companies that used to do this, and a certain California energy company just keeps coming up... :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #20 on: November 09, 2007, 02:01:55 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote
Since the items included or excluded from these measures are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance under GAAP, these measures should not be considered to be alternatives to net income as a measure of our operating performance or profitability. Since these measures, as presented, are not determined in accordance with GAAP

El Oh the fucking El.

How would you like your books, sautee'd, fried, or boiled?

I try to think of other companies that used to do this, and a certain California energy company just keeps coming up... :lol:


I didnt see where profitability or performance  was mentioned by either of you.

Here take a look again:

Net revenues increased 13% to $1.18 billion during the third quarter of 2007
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #21 on: November 09, 2007, 02:17:28 PM »
Bain Capital?  Who?  Respond!  Asswipe!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #22 on: November 09, 2007, 02:18:01 PM »
:rofl:

Anyone else notice that TheWho's boyfriend split (no, Who, I don't need your IP to tell these things) when we started talking about the stock?

I think we got a liiiiiittle too close to home for his taste.

[Office Space]Let's make that stock go down.[/Office Space]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #23 on: November 09, 2007, 02:19:49 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Bain Capital?  Who?  Respond!  Asswipe!


Post above yours was him.

When they start freaking out the first thing they lose is their obfuscation.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
20,000-50,000
« Reply #24 on: November 09, 2007, 02:27:38 PM »
Quote from: ""CCM girl 1989""
Bain Capitol?




Bain Capital.  Ask your buddy Who.

http://www.aspenyourth.info/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »