Did Sumner Hawley have sexual relations with students?

[Che Gookin]

You vote..

[Anonymous]

And yet we only have your word that Summie didn't molest any of the students.

Be an interesting poll.

Che,

Polls are meaningless. Hundreds of pretenders will crawl out of the woodwork. Every one of them will cast a hundred votes. Such vermin pullulate.

So far we've only the word of Ursus, who won't defend his claim. Read his last Joe Gauld post carefully. He's already backing away from it, hedging.

Ursis has destroyed what little credibility this Hyde Schools Forum once had. Che, you've very stupidly lent him a hand.  

Mike

[Che Gookin]

Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had?

Last I checked Ursus was against the likes of that piece of shit Joe Gauld.

Weren't you the one posting lemonparty links?

Again.. please be very specific and back up your claims. So far I've seen nothing to support your suggestions that sumner hawley didn't have any students other than hostile posts, porn links, and vague allegations.

[Anonymous]

where do you see " hedging"? i dont see it

[Anonymous]

Che,

If you think that my posts are hostile, vague, and consist of porn links, then you have never bothered to read the Hyde School Forum. In it, you'll find hundreds of descriptions and analyses of my Hyde experience, many signed. I've been investing in it since December 2006; you haven't invested even a minute's time reading it. So thanks for telling me like it is, Che. Thanks for taking charge of the Hyde Schools forum. It's always a great irony that you haters of authority want nothing more than to be authorities.

Mike

[Anonymous]

where do you see " hedging"? i dont see it

The hedge is in the sentenve below. Child molestation becomes a metaphor for ... well, I don't really know what Ursus means by "mind fuck," but it certainly isn't the other kind of fuck.  

Nobody said nuttin' 'bout lil boys, my dears!  It's called a MIND FUCK fer a reason...

[Anonymous]

where do you see " hedging"? i dont see it

The hedge is in the sentenve below. Child molestation becomes a metaphor for ... well, I don't really know what Ursus means by "mind fuck," but it certainly isn't the other kind of fuck.  

Nobody said nuttin' 'bout lil boys, my dears!  It's called a MIND FUCK fer a reason...

"Mind fuck" is used by most on fornits to mean brainwashing.  I don't understand what you mean by hedge either.  Nor is this "Ursus".

A hedge is a calculatedly noncommittal or evasive statement. In the future do your own homework.

It is from Ursus' IP. Did you think only admins were privy to that information?

[Anonymous]

Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had?  Again.. be specific and back up your claims.

I will tell Ursus directly. Or have you appointed yourself his guardian as well?

Mike

[Ursus]

It is from Ursus' IP. Did you think only admins were privy to that information?

It is not from my IP#.  You are not privy to much here that I am aware of.  You might be privy to more if you chose to register as a user, but that is your choice.

Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had?  Again.. be specific and back up your claims.

I will tell Ursus directly. Or have you appointed yourself his guardian as well?

Mike

I need no guardian but appreciate the gesture, although I tend to doubt it was intended as such.

Where have I made "a calculatedly noncommittal or evasive statement?"  Moreover, is there some kind of Mike's Law that I am violating by doing so?  Last time I checked, this was within the range of complexities that human language encompasses.

More importantly: Why are you stalking me?

[Anonymous]

It is from Ursus' IP. Did you think only admins were privy to that information?

It is not from my IP#.  You are not privy to much here that I am aware of.  You might be privy to more if you chose to register as a user, but that is your choice.

Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had?  Again.. be specific and back up your claims.

I will tell Ursus directly. Or have you appointed yourself his guardian as well?

Mike

I need no guardian but appreciate the gesture, although I tend to doubt it was intended as such.

Where have I made "a calculatedly noncommittal or evasive statement?"  Moreover, is there some kind of Mike's Law that I am violating by doing so?  Last time I checked, this was within the range of complexities that human language encompasses.

More importantly: Why are you stalking me?

Ursus,

You are paranoid. First it was a Billy complex. Now it is a Mike complex. I left the Hyde forum only once, to report, in the appropriate forum, a problem about pornography. Go back and look: you and Joe started posting there after me.

You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims.  Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.  

Mike

[Ursus]

Ursus,

You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims.  Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.  

Mike

Sounds to me like you are libeling me, Mike.  Find my alleged statement.  I have nothing to defend myself against.  I never used the word "boys."  

The first usage of the word "boys" was by that extremely obvious troll in the company or employ of Hyde or the Gaulds themselves sometime last night, the post you seized upon and thanked as "Friend."  Any observant Reader would have immediately recognized an attempt to elicit inflammatory and ill-thought excess of language on the part of Fornits posters, possibly to be used against them at a later date.  Thus far, you have been the only one to bite and sling pure mud; unfortunately for them, not in the direction they were hoping for.

Get a grip on yourself.  You are playing right into their hands.

[Anonymous]

Ursus,

You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims.  Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.  

Mike

I have nothing to defend myself against.  I never used the word "boys."  .

That is all I wanted you hear you say.

Get a grip on yourself.  You are playing right into their hands.

Whose? Billy's?

[Anonymous]

Ursus,

You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims.  Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.  

Mike

Sounds to me like you are libeling me, Mike.  Find my alleged statement.  I have nothing to defend myself against.  I never used the word "boys."  

The first usage of the word "boys" was by that extremely obvious troll in the company or employ of Hyde or the Gaulds themselves sometime last night, the post you seized upon and thanked as "Friend."  Any observant Reader would have immediately recognized an attempt to elicit inflammatory and ill-thought excess of language on the part of Fornits posters, possibly to be used against them at a later date.  Thus far, you have been the only one to bite and sling pure mud; unfortunately for them, not in the direction they were hoping for.

Get a grip on yourself.  You are playing right into their hands.

   I believe you used the phrase "child molester"  which would imply boys, given that the allegation is homosexual pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

It is from Ursus' IP. Did you think only admins were privy to that information?

It is not from my IP#.  You are not privy to much here that I am aware of.  You might be privy to more if you chose to register as a user, but that is your choice.

Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had?  Again.. be specific and back up your claims.

I will tell Ursus directly. Or have you appointed yourself his guardian as well?

Mike

I need no guardian but appreciate the gesture, although I tend to doubt it was intended as such.

Where have I made "a calculatedly noncommittal or evasive statement?"  Moreover, is there some kind of Mike's Law that I am violating by doing so?  Last time I checked, this was within the range of complexities that human language encompasses.

More importantly: Why are you stalking me?

Ursus,

You are paranoid. First it was a Billy complex. Now it is a Mike complex. I left the Hyde forum only once, to report, in the appropriate forum, a problem about pornography. Go back and look: you and Joe started posting there after me.

You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims.  Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.  

Mike

   Prince Albert was not porn.  It was an example of youth going to great length to shock in a desperate attempt to garner attention.   The intent of porn is to titillate, to appeal to the puriant interest of the consumer.  The Pa post was intened to shock and offend.   I certainly did not post the cupchics to titillate.  It was meant to be offensive.

[Anonymous]

Prince Albert was not porn.  It was an example of youth going to great length to shock in a desperate attempt to garner attention.   The intent of porn is to titillate, to appeal to the puriant interest of the consumer.  The Pa post was intened to shock and offend.   I certainly did not post the cupchics to titillate.  It was meant to be offensive.

There's not enough here already to shock and offend you?