Author Topic: SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO  (Read 3450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2007, 10:00:08 PM »
Anyone think The Who is correct? That it might not interest the GAO to know about the abusive facilities that Scheff has referred children to that are currently involved in law suits; or the lawsuit that has been filed against Scheff; or the alleged criminals in this industry that Scheff associates with; or the blogs Scheff writes to silence her critics?
What other real professional referral consultants have this type of track record of Ms. Scheff's?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2007, 10:07:51 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Anyone think The Who is correct? That it might not interest the GAO to know about the abusive facilities that Scheff has referred children to that are currently involved in law suits; or the lawsuit that has been filed against Scheff; or the alleged criminals in this industry that Scheff associates with; or the blogs Scheff writes to silence her critics?
What other real professional referral consultants have this type of track record of Ms. Scheff's?


I dont think the government is going to ask Sue S. for a list of abusive facilities.  They will look towards someone like ASTART for that information.  Sue couldnt provide them with anything that they dont already kow.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2007, 10:13:57 PM »
THE WHO has sunk to a new ignoramus level.

Yoo-Who .... Ever heard of consumer awareness and proctection?

People who use educational consultants or these so-callled parent resource companies are consumers of a product, in this case, a referral or recommendation to what these businesses often times claim are "pre-screened" programs for troubled youth. There is an element of "trust" that is often present in these businesses sales and marketing efforts (e.g. testimonials, references) not unlike what you would expect to see on any late night informercial for facial creams, makeup, work-out equipment, etc.  

When a consumer does not have a satisfactory experience with a product they have received, they are free to register a complaint, file a lawsuit, ask for a refund, etc.

That is the nature of the beast.  

An unhappy customer can cost a business much more than a single sale which is why most reputable companies strive to resolve complaints against them to the mutual satisfaction of both parties.

What's different about this business is the fact that when a child dies while in a program, there are no refunds.  

There are only wrongful death lawsuits.

And that, Who, makes consumer awareness and protection, as well as mandating full disclosure in this industry extremely important.

See ISAC's watchlist of programs and referrers to get an idea of what I mean.

http://www.isaccorp.org/watchlist.asp
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #18 on: October 31, 2007, 10:23:02 PM »
Of course WHO is not correct.  His analogy of the car salesman not telling a customer that they could be buying a potential death trap not being good for "business" is exactly why no one listens to the WHO.  He's got no moral compass or if he has one, it's stuck on stupid.  We are talking about CHILDREN you buffoon, not cars or toasters.

 :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2007, 10:52:40 PM »
Risky drugs are covered in warnings.

Risky therapies are only used with INFORMED CONSENT.

The Who is a fucking bastard.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2007, 10:57:50 PM »
Guest, the list continues:

The Who
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #21 on: October 31, 2007, 11:01:52 PM »
This has to be the absolutely dumbest thing Sue Scheff has ever done.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #22 on: October 31, 2007, 11:20:24 PM »
Its just PR. And she's struggling.

She's giving the impression she's some kind of institution or influential or ACTUALLY MATTERS AND THAT ANYONE ACTUALLY CARES (nobody cares of course) and is "working with" the GAO to "solve the problems" and "find safe programs".

I'll just have to edit the ED page  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2007, 11:27:12 PM »
Quote from: ""Che Gookin""
This has to be the absolutely dumbest thing Sue Scheff has ever done.
Just about.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2007, 11:44:28 PM »
Seriously?  IMHO, the comment Sue Scheff made about red panties on national television was downright bizarre.  Did anyone see that?  There's a video of the interview somewhere.  20/20 I Caught.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Joyce Harris

  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2007, 12:14:02 AM »
Huh?  :roll:  :exclaim:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #26 on: November 01, 2007, 12:22:59 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Seriously?  IMHO, the comment Sue Scheff made about red panties on national television was downright bizarre.  Did anyone see that?  There's a video of the interview somewhere.  20/20 I Caught.


Close.....
She had a national audience and chose to report that someone had asked, "have you smelled SS panties".
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?p=277175#277175
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #27 on: November 01, 2007, 12:30:46 AM »
Good Lord, that is too funny!  Thanks for the link, Deb.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2007, 01:43:00 AM »
Broward County Case Number:  CACE07018185 State Reporting Number:  062007CA018185AXXXCE
Court Type:  CIVIL DIVISION - CIRCUIT COURT Case Type:  OTHER CIVIL
Incident Date:  N/A Filing Date:  07/31/2007
Court Location:  CENTRAL COURTHOUSE Case Status:  OPEN
HELP

Case Parties
Relationship Last Name First Name Middle Name Party Type Sex Race Year of D.O.B. D.O.D. ID Type ID Number
001  LEACOCK  DAVID    AT          BARID  000000963496  
001  GREEN  SCOTT    PL              
002  SCHEFF  SUSAN  L  DF              
003  GREEN  MICHELE    PL              
004 PARENTS UNIVERSAL RESOURCE      DF              
006  EXPERTS INC      DF              
008  WHITE  KENNETH  EUGENE  AT          BARID  000000725013  
008  FOCAL POINT ACADEMY LLC      DF              
010  WHITE  KENNETH  EUGENE  AT          BARID  000000725013  
010  HORLACHER  GLEN    DF              
012  HOOPER  BOYD    DF              
  MOE  LEROY  H  JUDGE          JUDGE  13  

Key Dates - Future Scheduled Events
Event Date Event Description Room Time Presider Division Count
01/08/2008  HEARING  930A  0130  LEROY H MOE      
01/08/2008  HEARING  930A  0130  LEROY H MOE    
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF AND THE GAO
« Reply #29 on: November 01, 2007, 01:49:35 AM »
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket  

Case Docket
Case Number:  4D07-3283
Non-Final Civil Other Notice from Broward County  


CAREY BOCK  vs.  SUSAN SCHEFF, ETC., ET AL.
Lower Tribunal Case(s): 03-22837 18

       

Date Docketed Description Date Due Filed By Notes
08/22/2007  Case Filing Fee      
08/22/2007  Notice of Appeal Filed   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant    
08/22/2007  order appealed      
09/06/2007  Docketing Statement     AA Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052  
09/21/2007  ORD-Final Appeal Treated as Non-Final      
10/03/2007  Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant    
10/08/2007  Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief 10/23/2007   15 DAYS
10/19/2007  Initial Brief on Merits   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant  (4)  
10/19/2007  Appendix   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant  (1) (INDEX FILED 10/31/07)
10/25/2007  ORD-Stricken 11/04/2007   10 DAYS
10/31/2007  Amended Appellant's Initial Brief   Thomas H. Mcgowan 0234052, Appellant  (4) (INDEX TO APPENDIX ALSO FILED 10/31)
 

 

Supreme Court
First District Court of Appeal
Second District Court of Appeal
Third District Court of Appeal
Fourth District Court of Appeal
Fifth District Court of Appeal
 
 
Supreme Court Opinions
First DCA Opinions
Second DCA Opinions
Third DCA Opinions
Fourth DCA Opinions
Fifth DCA Opinions
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »