All records have been requested for my appeallete case. The records will include all documents exhibited, all testimony filed, all witness names and all juror names. We know there was not a court reporter present but we know there were exhibits and people, witness and jurors who were present in court.
What is the point?
1) To check all exhibits for authinticty to determine if any exhibits were altered in any way. If they have been altered or tampered with in any way, that constitutes purgery.
2) Witnesses and jurors were present for Scheff's testimony and for Mr. Pollack's instructions to the jury. The jury instructions provided by Mr. Pollack to the jury are within in question and to some constitute unethical practices in the court room.
3) The exhibits that the plaintiff presented may raise many questions, if there were questionable practices that we feel may disclose any criminal activity on behalf of the plaintiff and her attorney, there will be witnesses and jurors who can set the record straight.
I have been told that its not only court reporters who can provide evidence as to what transpired in that court room. I have been told there are witnesses, juorors and "exhibits" that can provide us with more about what went down during that trial.
We will be getting copies of the financial information that the plaintiff submitted. If she suffered somewhere in the vicinity of 6MM as she claims she did then there has to be evidence that shows how she derived at that figure.
I will keep everyone posted. So be looking for my new website
[email protected]
