Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Split: Who's Back to Derailing Threads
Troll Control:
Give the word, TheWho! Let's link up your posts!
What do you care anyway? You just post anon in support of yourself. We get it - YOU think YOU are a great guy and a victim of the system. Thanks for YOUR opinion.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: ""psy"" ---Well. If you can get permisssion from the who to make ALL his postings available to the public, then we might be able to work something out. If TheWho truly wants the truth to be known, fine by me.
He was NOT banned for what he did in a few minutes, either. I don't know who you are getting your information from.
As for labeling a FEW of his MANY posts with a cat in the hat, I agree with you that it was wrong. He should have just been banned and left it at that.
Hey. I don't like the idea of keeping all this secret either, but Ginger has a strict policy of not outing posts. If the Who waives that, in the interest of showing that he was not flooding the forum, fine, but he won't do it. Figure out for yourself why.
--- End quote ---
The who said he was responding to someone who had taken on his name and another who was continuously posting posts like the following (He doesn’t claim the moderator altered these posts):
--- Quote from: ""TheWho"" ---
Ha, Ha, Ha............. Sometimes this is too funny! You people will say anything to get attention or to manipulate... Ha, Ha, Ha... Well, you know, sometimes a kid getting anally gang-raped is the best way to deal with immaturity! You have to grow up some time.......Ha, Ha, Ha
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: ""TheWho"" ---
Wow, I really got those guys stirred up today! Sometimes I wonder why I even bother to respond, but these kids claiming to have been "victimized" or "abused" are really just exagerating things to manipulate parents into not seeking help. 99% of that stuff never even happened (lies) and the other 1% is overblown (manipulation). One thing I will admit though is that when I was visiting my daughter at ASR there were some "troubled girls" there who were coming on to me (I guess in an attempt to try to get me to take them out of there -manipulation- which I would never do). Looking back, some of them were pretty hot and if they liked sex, it wouldn't be "abuse" to give it to them! I definitely thought about it and bet that the counselors did too!
Back on topic...Ha, Ha, Ha... I will be updating the matrices today so you can pass them on to your colleagues. And thanks again for your advice. Fight fire with fire! I'm going to do it to "Bob" today!
--- End quote ---
Thewho responded (changed thewho name on the posts to someone elses name and reposted) and they went back and forth and he believes this is what was considered flooding. At least that is all he can think of for a possible reason. But it takes more than one person to have a flame war, I think is what he called it.
Ccxccc He responded to being banned but never received a response back from fornits.
Thewho said he would agree to having all his posts strung together under his name from: “his banned date backâ€
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote ---No, what I said was that Deb added the little guy and that was it
--- End quote ---
Anne, That is the point! when asked several months ago we were all told that the mods did not have this capability without leaving an edit trail. Now we know that they do have the capability of altering posts without leaving a trail that the post was changed.
--- End quote ---
As I remember it, and I could be wrong, it was an anon that said that. Did you hear that from a moderator or admin? I doubt it.
--- Quote ---We all know that people can repost and change other peoples words etc. and have fun with that if they like, but when push comes to shove the truth could be found by tracing the post back to the original. We now know that even the original posts can be altered without leavinga trace so tracing a post back to the original is not dependable anymore.
--- End quote ---
Yes, they can. So far, all that has been altered was just the addition of the icon to identify Who.
Look, this has happened to all of us. A great way to minimize the possibility is to USE YOUR DAMN LOGIN!!! If you're going to post anon, posing as a bunch of different people, someone's going to catch on and "out" you. That appears is what happened to Who. He was posting as many different people, got caught and is pissed. So what's new?
Whether the posts ore the original ones or have been tampered with we will never know because there is no way to qualify this aymore.[/quote]
TheWho:
--- Quote from: ""Anne Bonney"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote ---No, what I said was that Deb added the little guy and that was it
--- End quote ---
Anne, That is the point! when asked several months ago we were all told that the mods did not have this capability without leaving an edit trail. Now we know that they do have the capability of altering posts without leaving a trail that the post was changed.
--- End quote ---
As I remember it, and I could be wrong, it was an anon that said that. Did you hear that from a moderator or admin? I doubt it.
--- Quote ---We all know that people can repost and change other peoples words etc. and have fun with that if they like, but when push comes to shove the truth could be found by tracing the post back to the original. We now know that even the original posts can be altered without leavinga trace so tracing a post back to the original is not dependable anymore.
--- End quote ---
Yes, they can. So far, all that has been altered was just the addition of the icon to identify Who.
Look, this has happened to all of us. A great way to minimize the possibility is to USE YOUR DAMN LOGIN!!! If you're going to post anon, posing as a bunch of different people, someone's going to catch on and "out" you. That appears is what happened to Who. He was posting as many different people, got caught and is pissed. So what's new?
Whether the posts ore the original ones or have been tampered with we will never know because there is no way to qualify this aymore.
--- End quote ---
[/quote]
Sorry, Anne, you are wrong. The information came from Ginger when thewho complained and thewhos posts were altered and deleted while he was using his user name, not as a guest.
::hatter::
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---The who said he was responding to someone who had taken on his name and another who was continuously posting posts like the following (He doesn’t claim the moderator altered these posts):
--- End quote ---
Mods are the only ones who CAN alter them without something showing up. The only "alteration" that was done by mods (the only ones who can do that without evidence) was to add the icon.
--- Quote ---Thewho responded (changed thewho name on the posts to someone elses name and reposted) and they went back and forth and he believes this is what was considered flooding. At least that is all he can think of for a possible reason. But it takes more than one person to have a flame war, I think is what he called it.
--- End quote ---
He wasn't banned for that. He was banned for posing as different people and posting the same thing over and over again AS THOSE DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
--- Quote --- Ccxccc He responded to being banned but never received a response back from fornits.
--- End quote ---
If he didn't, he should have.
--- Quote ---Thewho said he would agree to having all his posts strung together under his name from: “his banned date backâ€
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version