Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Hidden Lake Academy gets new website!
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""Johnny Ringo"" ---You still don't get it you moron. If any staff member can prove that their livelihood would be effected (i.e. lose a job, not be considered for a job, etc.) due to false statements placed on your site using their real names you are liable.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, Jerry tried that too. Didn't fly then, won't fly now.
--- Quote --- Second, the use of the word nigger is considered the perpetuation of hate. This is enough to prove slander and get paid well.
--- End quote ---
How do you explain the Arian Nation holding rallies on courthouse steps?
Gonna answer those questions about the horses and this post yet?....
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=22811
It seems a bit convenient that you'd suddenly decide to stop "helping us" right when I call you out on those. Hmmmm.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Johnny Ringo"" --- Second, the use of the word nigger is considered the perpetuation of hate.
--- End quote ---
technically it's not, unless it's used to instigate violence. and still, neo-nazis, aryans, even church leaders continue to use it to instigate violence without legal consequence. i'm surprised you dont know this, considering your freinds [republicans] are totally against hate laws. recently, republicans vetoed a law requiring church and other organizational leaders to be held responsible if one of the people in the audience commits a violent act due to the minsters/pastors/etc hate speech.
and how would you explain rappers...or even white country music stars [david allen coe] using "nigger" constantly? sure there black and "there allowed to use it", or there from the south and it's a "cultural thing" but it's still hate speech, acording to you. even according to al sharpton it's hate speech, but people keep doing it cuz it's fuckin legal.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---aryans,
--- End quote ---
Oops. Ya know, I knew that too.
:oops:
Anonymous:
Is there any kind of hate speech on the Internet that is not protected by the First Amendment?
The U.S. Constitution protects Internet speech that is merely critical, annoying, offensive, or demeaning. However, the First Amendment does not provide a shield for libelous speech or copyright infringement, nor does it protect certain speech that threatens or harasses other people. For example, an e-mail or a posting on a Web site that expresses a clear intention or threat by its author to commit an unlawful act against another specific person is likely to be actionable under criminal law. Persistent or pernicious harassment aimed at a specific individual is not protected if it inflicts or intends to inflict emotional or physical harm. To rise to this level, harassment on the Internet would have to consist of a "course of conduct" rather than a single isolated instance.
There is legal precedent for such a prosecution. In 1998, a former student was sentenced to one year in prison for sending e-mail death threats to 60 Asian-American students at the University of California, Irvine. His e-mail was signed "Asian hater" and threatened that he would "make it my life career [sic] to find and kill everyone one [sic] of you personally." That same year, another California man pled guilty to Federal civil rights charges after he sent racist e-mail threats to dozens of Latinos throughout the country.
Yes. In 1999, a coalition of groups opposed to abortion was ordered to pay over $100 million in damages for providing information for a Web site called "Nuremberg Files," a site which posed a threat to the safety of a number of doctors and clinic workers who perform abortions. The site posted photos of abortion providers, their home addresses, license plate numbers, and the names of their spouses and children. In three instances, after a doctor listed on the site was murdered, a line was drawn through his name. Although the site fell short of explicitly calling for an assault on doctors, the jury found that the information it contained amounted to a real threat of bodily harm.
If a person's use of the Internet rises to the level of criminal conduct, it may subject the perpetrator to an enhanced sentence under a State's hate crime laws. Currently, 40 States and the District of Columbia have such laws in place. The criminal's sentence may be more severe if the prosecution can prove that he or she intentionally selected the victim based on his or her race, nationality, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. However, these laws do not apply to conduct or speech protected by the First Amendment.
Anonymous:
Uh oh! Looks like he hasn't cried it all out yet.
It's okay, Jeff. Horribly Post-Menopausal Mommy's here to wipe your tears and make it all better.
Maybe he's just got colic?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version