wouldn't it be better to spend my time editing the normal wikipedia since more people view that? or is it an issue that that information is being changed by programs all the time? i cant even find a link to fornits wikipedia, so is anyone actually even reading it?
It's actually quite difficult to write even a stub on regular wiki about behavior mod places, because one of wiki's standards is that all material must be unbiased.
It's not impossible, it's just that since almost all of the accounts are anecdotal at this point, who is to say which story is "right"? (from wiki's standpoint, that is.) Most of us are a bit passionate about this sort of thing, so to sift that away from the factual data can be hard, without editorializing it, especially since we know we're way fucking right.
I believe psy was in the process of penning something for regular wiki a while back, and I believe he finished it, too. I can't remember if it was on benchmark or something more comprehensive to the industry, though.