Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Sue Scheff Blog on WWASP Update
psy:
--- Quote from: ""ZenAgent"" ---"old court documents that we proved were inaccurate." Show me this proof. Why haven't you had the documents stricken if they're inaccurate?
--- End quote ---
That's the funniest part. I'm sure the court reporter would have a good laugh.
Anonymous:
Yea, if that is true about Scheff hitting her daughter in the face and grabbing her about the neck; then you are correct Zen Agent and that does goes beyond some "trying times between a mother and daughter."
And, who would Scheff seem to be threatning in this blog, or accusing of writing her daughter nasty emails? That just seems like as strange accusation.
ZenAgent:
During the WWASP vs. PURE trial, Scheff objected to WWASP using any personal family information. However, as WWASP noted, she had used her daughter's name and and experience at Carolina Springs as a "marketing tool" for PURE. The story was on helpyourteens.com. WWASP argued it was "somewhat disingenuous for Ms Scheff to now complain because her family information has been made public", and Judge Cassel permitted both parties to "file public pleadings referring to her daughter"
Scheff wanted the "reportedly" unsavory details of her family life kept private, since they could potentially stain her reputation and adversely affect her business. One would think Scheff acquired a basic respect for the private family lives of others in light of her own experience. As we've seen, though, Scheff considers the lives of private individuals fair game for libelous speculation and defamatory accusations. Scheff tried to keep details of her own family life out of a court room, yet she has no problem with posting libelous and defamatory speculation and hearsay about the personal family details of private individuals on her internet blogs.
"The truth prevailed" - there's a lot of hubris in Scheff, and there's an inevitable price for hubris. Have you no shame, Sue?
Anonymous:
Zen,
Scheff's only way of marketing Pure is by bashing others in an attempt to make herself and her company look better.
She can't claim to have any expertise because she doesn't have any.
Oh, and her claim she has helped over 1,000 families sounds a lot like WWASP's 98% success rate quote. I am sure that she provides the numbers just like those people (WWASP) she learned from do.
Anonymous:
Just saw that "helped over 1,000 familes" and wondered--what possibly ABUSIVE program like a WWASP program, or Sorenson's Ranch, Red Rock, or Whitmore Academy did Sue-Sue refer those children to, and are those kids OK today?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version