Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Sue Scheff Blog on WWASP Update
Anonymous:
Sue Scheff's update on the WWASP BLOG seems to be an attempt to deny that she continued to refer parents to WWASP for several months after she started PURE.
Does this mean Scheff is denying the truth of testimony by Richey in the WWASP vs PURE transcripts that has been posted several times on Fornits? Didn't Richey provide emails in this testimony he provided under oath?
Does this mean Scheff is denying the "Hinton Letter" that seems to praise Scheff's continued business with WWASP after she started PURE?
http:suescheff-wwasp.blogspot.com/
Will readers be highly criticized for reading these PUBLIC BLOGS, in yet another Scheff blog?
Anonymous:
http://suescheff-wwasp.blogspot.com/
Anonymous:
There is no blog....??? Has it been taken down already???
Anonymous:
No, it's still there.
http://suescheff-wwasps.blogspot.com/
ZenAgent:
Oh, yeah. Sue has seen the post about her "reportedly" hitting her daughter in the face and grabbing her by the neck "reportedly" from the WWASP trial documents. She wanted the "reported" report allegedly written by her daughter kept out of the WWASP trial, for obvious reasons.
"As most mother-daughter relationships, we had some trying times." Hey Sue, that's still not a denial. The assault your daughter "reportedly" wrote about was too violent to be written off as "trying times".
"Who is doing it? I don't have to think too long on that. And thankfully she gets it too." You can't think too long, Sue. Nicely veiled threat, but you're clueless. You're not making a lot of friends these days, quite the opposite.
"old court documents that we proved were inaccurate." Show me this proof. Why haven't you had the documents stricken if they're inaccurate? You've had years.
What's the book called? "A Twits End"? I'll bet it's full of prevailing truths, huh? Good work, hack your book while you spin feeble defenses.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version