Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
CAICA FUNDRAISER
Anonymous:
So what's the deal? If CAICA is a non-profit, why not just provide a link for potential donors to verify their donation is indeed, tax-deductible? That's what ISAC does.
:roll:
Anonymous:
Izzy lists CAICA as a "Washington Non-Profit" for her fundraiser.
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/search.aspx
Anyone see CAICA listed here?
Anonymous:
Anyone find CAICA on the IRS Publication 78 website?
www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=96136,00.html
Perhaps Izzy could just post her Non-Profit status to assure all contributors that their donations are tax dedutible. That's what ISAC does.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Izzy lists CAICA as a "Washington Non-Profit" for her fundraiser.
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/search.aspx
Anone see CAICA listed here?
--- End quote ---
Not listed.
Anonymous:
Near as I can tell, CAICA is listed as a corporate non profit, but not registered as a charitable org with Washington State nor the IRS. If this is not correct, please post correct info or a link.
Re the CHIP-IN fundraiser. As I recall, the goal was to raise $10,000 before the fundraiser ends in August.
To date, since April 18, 2007 total donations to CAICA is $100.00.
Not sure why Isabelle claims donations are "tax-deductible" given there is no information on her website or numerous blogs for consumers to verify for themselves, unlike ISAC who provides a link to the IRS website where one can confirm their status as a 501 (c) 3 non profit organization.
Perhaps the best way to resolve this issue is for Zehnder to follow ISAC's lead and make this information easily accessible to potential donors.
Personally I would be loathe to make a donation to any organization that doesn't fully disclose the status of their organization or fails to provide any sort of documentation whatsoever.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version