Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
Academy at Swift River - Split from TTI
psy:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""TheWho"" --- They all know ASR meets the requirements and the laws of Massachusetts. They are trying to use laws that apply to a mental hospital and apply it to ASR , which they are not.
--- End quote ---
If they meet the law's requirements, why were they cited by the state for violating the law? Curious, isn't it?
--- Quote ---"OCCS also cited the school for monitoring students' telephone calls and mail. The agency said that the right to privacy incommunications, even for juveniles, can be restricted only by court order -- for example (editing note: this is exactly the argument TheWho used earlier in the thread and it's 100% illegal!), if a therapist believes that the teen's communication should be monitored, perhaps to support a young person through a crisis in relations with his orher family -- and then only temporarily."
--- End quote ---
We haven't even gotten to this other violation of the law yet, and it's even scarier!
--- Quote ---[/b]It (OCCS) cited the school for"using behavior management techniques which subject students to verbal abuse, ridicule and humiliation, denial ofsufficient sleep, and repetitive exercise as a response to an infraction of a rule."[/b]
This is good practice and very therapeutic, which is why ASR was cited fot it. :roll:
Bottom line is that ASR uses dangerous techniques that they've been cited for and illegally restricts communication for which they've also been cited.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Yeah. If they use propheets (LGAT), and that's what it definitely sounds like, ritual humiliation, denial of sleep etc... it's definitely there. Been there, experienced that, got the t-shirt (literally... each group got a t-shirt)...
TheWho:
--- Quote ---If they meet the law's requirements, why were they cited by the state for violating the law?
--- End quote ---
The old, Documented evidence without the documents statement. This is getting old....show us the Documents
I heard the report praised ASR for having an outstanding program and the state is in the process of using ASR as a model for pilot programs in a few of their high schools. But I guess you just forgot to mention that little piece of information.
Troll Control:
--- Quote ---[/u]"OCCS also cited the school for monitoring students' telephone calls and mail. The agency said that the right to privacy incommunications, even for juveniles, can be restricted only by court order -- for example (editing note: this is exactly the argument TheWho used earlier in the thread and it's 100% illegal!), if a therapist believes that the teen's communication should be monitored, perhaps to support a young person through a crisis in relations with his orher family -- and then only temporarily."[/u]
In case you missed it, here it is again. This is from the local paper. If you think the paper, OCCS and its investigator, Mr. Lieberman are all lying, then take it up with them.
ASR has already been busted for violating kid' rights under law. Case closed.
--- End quote ---
TheWho:
--- Quote from: [b ---thewho wrote:[/b]
The old, Documented evidence without the documents statement. This is getting old....show us the Documents
I heard the report praised ASR for having an outstanding program and the state is in the process of using ASR as a model for pilot programs in a few of their high schools. But I guess you just forgot to mention that little piece of information.
--- End quote ---
Troll Control:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Ha,Ha,Ha... I'm not going to do your busy work. If you have documents that show otherwise, post them.
We have already established these facts and I think everyone is comfortable with where we're at in this debate:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---[/u]"OCCS also cited the school for monitoring students' telephone calls and mail. The agency said that the right to privacy incommunications, even for juveniles, can be restricted only by court order -- for example (editing note: this is exactly the argument TheWho used earlier in the thread and it's 100% illegal!), if a therapist believes that the teen's communication should be monitored, perhaps to support a young person through a crisis in relations with his orher family -- and then only temporarily."[/u]
--- End quote ---
Sorry, Who, but these are the facts. I guess you can take it up with OCCS and investigator Lieberman and try to change the records Ha,Ha,Ha...
--- End quote ---
I know you get mad mad about this, Who, but you can't change history and the state's records to suit your agenda...Ha,Ha,Ha. You'll have to take this up with the state if you don't like their ruling, not fornits! Do your own work, I'm not going to do it for you. Ha,Ha, Ha...
--- End quote ---
This is where we're at. If anyone can provide evidence that states otherwise, then we'll have to discuss how that can be interpreted. But right now, we're all in agreement that ASR was cited for violating the law.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version