Yes it does seem they have the funds for better teachers and professional counselors, but no ethical professional would work at Hyde. It would go against most everything they were taught and would probably be an ethics problem.
They would not have to be ethical , just competent. Some at intake to screen for things that Hyde is not capable to handle. Gee would they have any students if they did that? ROFL
If psychologists are under oath to report psychologically harmful practices by their employers, then it is not in Hyde's best interests to hire them.
Many fine, well-intentioned, decent faculty get attracted to the place by virtue of Hyde's stated goals. It is not until they have been there a while that they realize it is actually an LGAT for teens and their parents. That's also partly why, the parsimonious salary aside, the faculty tend to be young. The older ones are hipper to that fishy fishy smell.
Not all psychologists are ethical ones. Moreover, treatment of brainwashing and thought coercion victims is still sadly under-recognized in the mental health field. Hence, many will not see "the Hyde experience" for what it is until they've been there awhile, and have had opportunity to witness scenarios such as the one detailed in the Burnside piece on Mr. W. The real kicker on this issue, however, is probably one of salary expectations! Ha!