Author Topic: The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.  (Read 12357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #60 on: March 07, 2007, 04:17:26 AM »
The auxiliary entrance isn't the ass, silly. I'm talking about front-loading, here. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your connection.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #61 on: March 08, 2007, 12:51:41 AM »
The not liking anal part.

Also, I just realized that you might be one of the few fagots (if not the only one) to have an actual period  :o
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #62 on: March 08, 2007, 07:20:11 PM »
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
The not liking anal part.

Also, I just realized that you might be one of the few fagots (if not the only one) to have an actual period  :o


 :rofl:  I haven't had one of those since 1993!

The miracles of testosterone.

Kind of interesting going through menopause and a second puberty at the same time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #63 on: March 08, 2007, 09:53:44 PM »
Man-o-pause
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Curious
« Reply #64 on: March 09, 2007, 06:24:54 PM »
I'm curious Castle. As a person who benefits from loving both sexes, what does each sex do better in the sack? A m/f comparison.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Curious
« Reply #65 on: March 09, 2007, 10:16:37 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
I'm curious Castle. As a person who benefits from loving both sexes, what does each sex do better in the sack? A m/f comparison.


Hard to say. It's been so long since I've been with a woman I barely remember enough to come up with a basis for comparison. I'm hoping to rectify that soon.

I really don't know if there is a certain thing that women would do better than men, or vice versa. I know that several straight and bi men I have had as tricks said that we are overall better at sucking cock, which is probably why these guys were on the down-low to begin with.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #66 on: March 22, 2007, 10:40:15 PM »
Yanno, I'm thinking I just suck with the youngin's period...

I'm gonna go for the MILF's, fuck it! Even if I cant keep one for a long tie, eventually I'll be 30... and well...  :lol: then I'll be great.

But honestly, someone comfortable with herself, gone with all the immature BULLSHIT a lot of young women/girls have regarding relationships and sex, plus sometimes eager for getting some real good treatment vs the same old boring shit or an inattentive asshole hubby/bf...

Eh, everything thats really worked for me was 30+, I guess I just don't know how to handle immature girls.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #67 on: March 22, 2007, 10:42:14 PM »
Whoops that was me
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #68 on: March 22, 2007, 11:18:59 PM »
As far as I'm concerned, women don't truly hit their stride and become smokin' hot until they are over 40.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #69 on: March 22, 2007, 11:20:34 PM »
Ok castle, how the fuck do I go find them? Im at work 1-9 or 5-9... or somewhere between 1-5 when I go to work!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #70 on: March 22, 2007, 11:29:10 PM »
When I find out, I'll let you know.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
How do you find them?
« Reply #71 on: March 28, 2007, 08:03:44 PM »
N: post your pic and profile here. Radius willing to travel.

Or go to grocery store.  We all gotta eat!

Or--meet some Nice MILFs at the Gym.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline flygirl

  • Posts: 46
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #72 on: March 28, 2007, 10:32:51 PM »
Quote from: ""try another castle""
As far as I'm concerned, women don't truly hit their stride and become smokin' hot until they are over 40.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #73 on: July 15, 2007, 01:26:53 AM »
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
The insecurity on part of the MILF is what ruined my last attempt with one who was 36  :(


Interesting in how you automatically blame the other, with total disregard of your part in the relationship's demise.

Actually, Niles, the "MILF" was tiring of your usage of "nigger" in every third sentence, your total disregard for any rational opinion that might challenge your own, and your overall narcissism.  It had little to do with the fact that she had noticed a few more facial lines.

You have to wonder how shallow you must be to be turned off by the common concerns of a woman approaching forty.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #74 on: July 15, 2007, 08:26:32 AM »
It seems this guest has some inside scoop on Niles.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »