Uh, CCM, there are no good duckfarms.
That being, coersion/isolation/BM/minimum duration programs do not work, are not good, and can not be defended or justified.
If you are looking for an alternative to programs, that being institutions that treat only those who need treatment and accept it with no abuse, neglect, torture, isolation, LGATs, or coercion, and tell people looking for programs to turn to actual treatment, I would be all for that.
Program apologetics and spindoctoring, I am not.
At any rate, why place people in programs at all? They don't do any good and people turn out fine despite them, and we've done fine for thousands of years without any 'answer' to give parents an easy button.
Until necessity and efficacy is established how can you morally or ethically do edconning at all?