Author Topic: Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy  (Read 3056 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« on: December 18, 2006, 12:27:25 PM »
I heard that some red hot mad lawyer is not too happy with Izzy and Sue-sue about using the lawyer's name and written stuff on their webs.  Guess there's gonna be some trouble.   :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2006, 03:37:36 PM »
OH NO.....sue sue and izzy in trouble?
What shall they do?
Wasn't it posted that izzy has no insurance?
And that sue sue's little ole insurance that pays attorneys is no more?
YiKES!
Will what will they do?
Think sue sue will share the trust-fund-money with izzy, her friend?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Isabelle Zehnder Advocate of the Solar System
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2006, 09:36:46 PM »
Maybe Sue-sue will give money to Izzy to defend herself in the lawsuit.  

Maybe Sue-sue will share the $11 million dollars she ripped off from Carey Bock so Izzy doesn't have to get screwed by a jury trial like what happened to Carey Bock.  

Oh, but then Sue-sue just sued to "make a point" right?  So there isn't any defense money to share with Izzy.  So sorry Izzy.

Too bad for Izzy the Advocate of the Solar System.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2006, 09:44:40 PM »
If Izzy has insurance to cover her in the lawsuits about to hit her she is one lucky cowgirl--or cow boy.  I did read Scheff got her insurance cancelled after her million dollar defense against WWASP.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
PURE Rebuttal
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2006, 09:55:04 PM »
"Defendants' false and misleading statements, and material omissions, contained in defendants advertising violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125(a)."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2006, 01:13:03 AM »
"DEFENDANTS".........who?   Sue sue and Izzy?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Izzy and the Red Hot Lawyer
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2006, 06:14:16 PM »
Sue Scheff was the defendant.  WWASP vs. Sue Scheff and PURE

Izzy has copied some writings of "the mad red hot lawyer" as something that Izzy wrote.

Can't wait to tell on Izzy! ::alieneyesa::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2006, 06:33:40 PM »
Well......it's been reported, said that IZZY copies from other people's websites all the time and uses it on CA-CA. Does she just think she can just "steal" or copy attorney's stuff and "claim it as her own" TOO?

As Charlie Brown would say, "GOOD GRIEF!"

We here say, "WTF?"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Fat Zehnder
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2006, 08:25:56 PM »
Izzy has "published" articles and saying they are "by" Isabelle Zehnder but big parts of the articles are really written by "the" lawyer.  I saw them on the internet and I wonder if fat-so can even get them off before "the" lawyer sees them.   :rofl:  Kind-a funny and about time someone yanked these broads back in line.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Turley Law and CAICA
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2006, 08:35:12 PM »
Turley Law Firm told Izzy to take off their law firm's web banner from the CAICA web site.

Izzy is a dumb ass.  Oh that's right she is a "professional" except of course when she comes up against professionals.   ::noway::  

But why do Sue-sue and Fat Izzy keep pushing down their very own message board here on fornits?   :-?  I thought they liked to be "in the news"  :question:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2006, 09:15:09 PM »
What articles?   The ones on E-Zine or on CAICA?  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2006, 01:09:43 PM »
Seriously, what's this all about?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Copyright Infringement Sue and Izzy
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2006, 04:06:42 PM »
Is Izzy doing the IZZY SHUFFLE again?  

Ya know, moving stuff around her website to shine a spotlight on herself just in case anybody is reading?

 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Michelle Sutton sponsored by Isabelle Zehnder
« Reply #13 on: December 26, 2006, 02:40:12 PM »
Check out the Izzy web now.  She had some kind of "Izzy Rally" and had Michelle Sutton all over for the public to see.  Wonder if Izzy bothered to ask Michelle's mother if this would be okay?  More trouble for FAT-Izzy Pig for copyright infringement?  Don't know but a lawyer would know.

I wonder why Izzy steals so much.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164659
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Theft of Michelle Sutton Mommie's Photo
« Reply #14 on: December 26, 2006, 07:43:29 PM »
Lets see Michelle Sutton died and her family suffers.  But who would take advantage of that?

Izzy Zhender and CAICA.  Who else?   :-?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »