Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Historical letters/ Sue Scheff/ WWASPS
ZenAgent:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I think you misunderstand the intent of the quote about Joyce Harris. There is no insinuation that the writer supports Sue Scheff or Sudweeks. Just that Scheff and Sudweeks are defaming Joyce Harris but this is not uncommon with Scheff and probably Sudweeks.
Anyway "hungry lawyer" sue away! A number of us have plenty of money and can defend ourselves from Sue Scheff or anyone else.
--- End quote ---
I understood the intent of the postings completely. What I wrote above is valid. "Misunderstanding" is the mother of defamation lawsuits.
Anonymous:
Lighten up Zen! This entire thread is a wreck because of postings like yours.
--- Quote from: ""ZenAgent"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I think you misunderstand the intent of the quote about Joyce Harris. There is no insinuation that the writer supports Sue Scheff or Sudweeks. Just that Scheff and Sudweeks are defaming Joyce Harris but this is not uncommon with Scheff and probably Sudweeks.
Anyway "hungry lawyer" sue away! A number of us have plenty of money and can defend ourselves from Sue Scheff or anyone else.
--- End quote ---
I understood the intent of the postings completely. What I wrote above is valid. "Misunderstanding" is the mother of defamation lawsuits.
--- End quote ---
ZenAgent:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Lighten up Zen! This entire thread is a wreck because of postings like yours.
--- Quote from: ""ZenAgent"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I think you misunderstand the intent of the quote about Joyce Harris. There is no insinuation that the writer supports Sue Scheff or Sudweeks. Just that Scheff and Sudweeks are defaming Joyce Harris but this is not uncommon with Scheff and probably Sudweeks.
Anyway "hungry lawyer" sue away! A number of us have plenty of money and can defend ourselves from Sue Scheff or anyone else.
--- End quote ---
I understood the intent of the postings completely. What I wrote above is valid. "Misunderstanding" is the mother of defamation lawsuits.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Wreck? No, it's FUBAR, and I doubt my posts drove it into the ground. I refuse to "lighten up" on Sudweeks and Scheff.
Anonymous:
Sue Scheff had some fraud scheme going with someone named Diane Lucchetti. Sue Scheff would claim that she sold parents on WWASP but let Diane take the money from Teen Help. Then Sue would claim Diane sold parents on WWASP and that Sue was entitled to the referral fees -- which were thousands of dollars.
It was a scam and boy oh boy oh boy is Sue-Sue good at scams. A professional con artist.
Trial of Sue Scheff page 201:
Q. Ms. Scheff, in August of 2001, Teen Help . . . stopped paying you referral fees because of the subterfuge you had goind with Diane Lucchetti; isn?t that correct?
A. That is a completely false statement?.
Q. You never collected a fee after July of 2001?
A. I will explain why the fees came in.
Our dear Ms. Scheff goes on to explain on page 202 of the trial transcript:
A. Narvin Lichfield was offering to pay me what Lynn Prezfeld (misspelled Crestfield) gets down in Miami. Down in Miami, Lynn Prezfeld is the leading recruiter for WWASP?.
Dear Missy Scheff goes on to say that in the spring of that year (2001) she heard of the abuse at WWASP yet she continued to refer to WWASP until their marketing company Teen Help refused to pay her for the little insider scam Scheff set up with another person by the name of Diane Lucchetti.
Well there ya have it. Thank you Sue Scheff for all these trials you are having because it just gets clearer and clearer the kind of dark wicked evil snake you are.
And don?t think we won?t be taken a close look at your transcripts in the Carey Bock case. You are a witch IN OUR OPINION.
Page 203 trial transcript of Sue Scheff with the Q being the lawyer and the A being our dear Missy Sue-Sue Scheff.
Q. And at the bottom (of the PURE web site) it says, ?All PURE approved transporters have a high level of education with degrees in mental health.? That was an untrue statement?
A. No, that was a true statement, sir.
Q. Let?s go to the next page, please (of the PURE web site). And this paragraph right here (indicating) indicates that one of your approved transporters was Lorraine Colpitts form Safe and Sound Transportation in Maine, right?
A. That is correct. That is her company??..
Q. Now, I would like to go down to the paragraph that says from the late 80?s, that is the paragraph talking about this Ms. Colpitts; isn?t it?
A. Yes.
Q. It says, ?Although Lorraine did not obtain a formal degree in mental health, she has taken many relevant courses? and it goen on to say, ?she has several years experience as a school bus driver.? That is what it says?
A. That is working with children??
Q. That is fine. You answered my question.
Oh yea, that is a degree in mental health and working with children to a scam artist like Sue Scheff.
Anonymous:
That's right up there with Sue Scheff's description of the admitted abuser, owner of Whitmore Academy--Cheryl Sudweeks as:
"a Christian woman who just loves children and, who has a smile that will just light up a room!"
Yea, right!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version