Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Historical letters/ Sue Scheff/ WWASPS
Anonymous:
Wonder why the Broward County PTA would even allow such postings to be on their website?
Anonymous:
Sue said you WERE part of the civil lawsuit but you pulled out because of all the bad things she and Cheryl found out about you and your husband.
--- Quote from: ""Joyce Harris"" ---In response to the statement:
"The stuff she said about your and your husband--well you are the one with the lawsuit."
I do not know what this statement means.
My family was never part of the criminal case that the County Attorney, Jared Eldridge, filed against Cheryl Sudweeks.
My family is not part of the current Civil Case that is pending against the Sudweeks/Whitmore Academy.
If this type of information is being spread by Sue Scheff or Cheryl Sudweeks--please consider the source.
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Old, tired, untrue gossip. Let the Suds supoena them if it matters.
ZenAgent:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Sue said you WERE part of the civil lawsuit but you pulled out because of all the bad things she and Cheryl found out about you and your husband.
--- Quote from: ""Joyce Harris"" ---In response to the statement:
"The stuff she said about your and your husband--well you are the one with the lawsuit."
I do not know what this statement means.
My family was never part of the criminal case that the County Attorney, Jared Eldridge, filed against Cheryl Sudweeks.
My family is not part of the current Civil Case that is pending against the Sudweeks/Whitmore Academy.
If this type of information is being spread by Sue Scheff or Cheryl Sudweeks--please consider the source.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Hey, "Guest" - be careful what you post based on second-hand information from people like Scheff and Sudweeks. Cheryl's record proves she's not a font of truth. I think anyone who's child was referred to an abusive facility (like Whitmore) by Scheff might have misgivings about her integrity.
Guest, your vague implications are becoming defamatory. Fornits is anonymous, but don't think you're completely shielded. You're engaging in speculation on a public forum about a private individual who, unlike Scheff, is NOT a limited public figure.
Defamation consists of the following:
(1) a defamatory statement;
(2) published to third parties; and
(3) which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.
We hold that a private individual may recover actual damages for a defamatory publication upon proof that the defendant knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known that the defamatory statement was false. The conduct of defamation defendants will be judged on whether the conduct was that of a reasonable person under the circumstances.
Make damn sure you have your facts straight before you post hearsay from admittedly biased second parties about private individuals. Hungry attorneys prowl Fornits.
Anonymous:
I think you misunderstand the intent of the quote about Joyce Harris. There is no insinuation that the writer supports Sue Scheff or Sudweeks. Just that Scheff and Sudweeks are defaming Joyce Harris but this is not uncommon with Scheff and probably Sudweeks.
Anyway "hungry lawyer" sue away! A number of us have plenty of money and can defend ourselves from Sue Scheff or anyone else.
--- Quote from: ""ZenAgent"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Sue said you WERE part of the civil lawsuit but you pulled out because of all the bad things she and Cheryl found out about you and your husband.
--- Quote from: ""Joyce Harris"" ---In response to the statement:
"The stuff she said about your and your husband--well you are the one with the lawsuit."
I do not know what this statement means.
My family was never part of the criminal case that the County Attorney, Jared Eldridge, filed against Cheryl Sudweeks.
My family is not part of the current Civil Case that is pending against the Sudweeks/Whitmore Academy.
If this type of information is being spread by Sue Scheff or Cheryl Sudweeks--please consider the source.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Hey, "Guest" - be careful what you post based on second-hand information from people like Scheff and Sudweeks. Cheryl's record proves she's not a font of truth. I think anyone who's child was referred to an abusive facility (like Whitmore) by Scheff might have misgivings about her integrity.
Guest, your vague implications are becoming defamatory. Fornits is anonymous, but don't think you're completely shielded. You're engaging in speculation on a public forum about a private individual who, unlike Scheff, is NOT a limited public figure.
Defamation consists of the following:
(1) a defamatory statement;
(2) published to third parties; and
(3) which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.
We hold that a private individual may recover actual damages for a defamatory publication upon proof that the defendant knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known that the defamatory statement was false. The conduct of defamation defendants will be judged on whether the conduct was that of a reasonable person under the circumstances.
Make damn sure you have your facts straight before you post hearsay from admittedly biased second parties about private individuals. Hungry attorneys prowl Fornits.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version