Author Topic: Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school  (Read 11719 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2006, 11:50:42 AM »
I don't think Izzy or Susan have much to do with the case. I think maybe they helped gather the information to present to this law group . I base this guess on how the CA "firm" was found.  This doesn't mean they have anything else to say on the matter, and people should not get to hung up on the two of them and their "involvement".

I think maybe not stupid is fairly new to this "advocating" group, and has a lot to learn. I would guess they really are not stupid; just not yet well informed. Experience is the best teacher; and those who experience these two ladies, usually do learn.

I would like to suggest to all concerned that this case not be litigated on Fornits.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2006, 12:11:31 PM »
Good advice, Buzz. Details of the case should be held in confidence and only discussed with the attorneys. And don't tell anything you don't want blasted all over to Izzy. Look what that woman did at Majestic Ranch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2006, 12:31:46 PM »
Buzzkill,

The TURLEY lawfirm's amended complaint is already online, posted at CAICA so it's in the "public domain" now.  Anyone can read it and see who the 25 plaintiffs are and read the allegations.

http://caica.org/First%20Amended%20Comp ... 20Wood.pdf

In addition, there's this press release by Isabelle Zehnder of CAICA just published (10-16-06).  

---------------------


Troubled Teen Programs - 25 Plaintiffs Join in Lawsuit Against WWASPS, Cross Creek Manor, Robert Lichfield, and Associates ? More Expected to Join In
 
Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse
10/16/2006 12:51:49 AM

Children were allegedly forced to eat their vomit, beaten, thrown, slammed to the ground, tied at the wrists and ankles, and more

Salt Lake City, UT (October 15, 2006) ? On August 25, 2006, William Chase Wood and his parents, Tamie and Gregory Wood, filed a lawsuit against the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS) and their associates, alleging Child Abuse, Fraud, Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, Gross Negligence, RICO Violations, False Imprisonment, Assault, Battery, and More.


Twenty-five new plaintiffs have joined in the Wood lawsuit and filed an Amended Complaint in the Utah Federal Court on October 13, 2006. Families from California, Texas, Maryland, Kentucky, Lousiana, Florida, Minnesota, and Michigan have decided to fight back against this corporate giant.


Plaintiffs are represented by the prominent and prestigious Turley Law Firm of Dallas, Texas, that is co-counseling with famed attorney, Richard Henriksen of Henriksen and Henriksen, P.C., who successfully defeated WWASPS in August 2004 when WWASPS sued a Florida mother, Sue Scheff, for speaking out against them. WWASPS appealed, and Henriksen won the appeal in June 2006.


What you are about to read is extremely disturbing and is not something one would think could be happening in and outside our country and certainly not in 2006. But the facts speak for themselves ? not only is it hard to ignore the countless children and parents who are coming forward to bring light to the abuse and neglect children have endured in WWASPS programs - but it is hard to ignore the countless news articles and segments on Dateline NBC, Primetime, 48 Hours, Inside Edition, Fox News - that allege abuse and neglect in these programs.


Many children and parents have contacted our organization, the Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse (CAICA), to share their stories. It is the consistency of their stories that are chilling and that raise serious concern.


Over the past decade thousands of children have been housed in WWASPS programs. Children were not placed there, for the most part, because they were in trouble with the law. These are generally children whose parents, for one reason or another, seek outside help for their children and teens - to the tune of about $40,000 to $60,000 per year or more. While some parents can afford to pay for these programs, others cannot and are forced to take out second mortgages, tap into their retirement funds or their children?s college funds.


According to the Amended Complaint, every child named was subjected to multiple forms of child abuse over extended periods of time. While parents believed they had sent their children to programs that would provide them a proper education and, depending on the situation, help for their troubled child or teen, according to the Amended Complaint, some children were:


? Forced to eat their own vomit


? Kicked, beaten, thrown, and slammed to the ground


? Bound and tied by their hands/and or feet


? Chained and locked in dog cages


? Forced to stay in isolation for long periods of times


? Locked in small boxes or cages


? Locked in basements


? Forced to lie in or wear urine and feces as a method of punishment


? Forced to clean and scrub toilets and floors with their toothbrush and then use the toothbrush afterwards


? Forced to sleep on cold concrete floors, box springs, or plywood used as beds ? some had no bed linens


? Forced to assume distorted and painful physical positions for long periods of time


? Forced to live in unsanitary living conditions


? Denied adequate food


? Denied even a minimally sufficient education


? Denied proper medical and dental treatment and care


? Exposed to extreme hot and cold temperatures for long periods of time


? Forced to exercise beyond their physical capacity


? Forced to carry heavy bags of sand or logs around their neck throughout the day over many days


? Sexually abused, including sexual relations and acts of fondling and masturbation performed on them


? Emotional abuse by subjecting children to near total parental and societal isolation; personal visits, correspondence, and telephone calls were either forbidden or discouraged


? Because of near-total isolation, these children were totally unequipped to enter outside society


? Forced to work many hours a day violating child labor laws


? Confiscated and/or kept students? US mail


? Deprived from using the toilet, and as a result, urinated or defecated on themselves


? Verbally abused by lying that their parents knew what was happening to them and were supportive of it all


? Subjected to buddy system where older students were allowed to physically, mentally, and sexually abuse younger students and manage them as part of ?cleansing? process


? Deprived of sleep


? Forced to wear the same, unwashed clothes for weeks at a time


? In most cases. denied religious affiliation


? Forced to eat raw or rotten food


? Poked and prodded with various objects while being strip-searched


? Forced to write false confession letters to parents to justify being sent to the WWASPS schools


? Threatened severe punishment, including death, if they told anyone about the abuse or poor living conditions --



The Amended Complaint seeks damages for:


? Battery


? Assault


? False imprisonment


? Negligence


? Defendants? intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress


? Actual and constructive fraud


? Breach of contract/breach of warranty


? Conspiracy and fraudulent concealment


? RICO violations


? Breach of fiduciary duty


? Wrongful and actionable conduct of defendants


? Breach of statutory duty to prevent child abuse


? Breach of duty to act imposed by prior dangerous conduct


? Breach of duty to aid another harmed by defendants? conduct


? Negligent assumption of risk of intentional or criminal conduct


? Negligent misrepresentation involving risk of physical harm


? Utah deceptive trade practices violations


? Gross negligence and exemplary damages --



The facts of the case allege that each parent entrusted their minor children to the control and direction of defendants because defendants marketed themselves as a residential boarding school where children with problems could get an education while receiving instruction and direction in behavior modification for emotional growth and personal development.


The Amended Complaint seeks damages to each student and each parent plaintiff and requests an injunction against further physical, emotional, or sexual abuse of minor children. It requests an injunction against further deceptive advertising. It is asking for an order against destruction or spoliation of evidence.


The Amended Complaint goes on to say student plaintiffs alledgedly witnessed other children being kicked, hit, slammed, beaten, thrown to the ground, and humiliated by teachers, supervisors, and/or staff, that their human rights were violated when Defendants used isolation as a form of punishment, that Defendants often conspired with one parent or guardian to kidnap or take away by force the child from another parent with equal or superior custody, and that Defendants conspired with parents to implement an ?Exit Plan?, which had the effect of compelling the student to remain at the schools past the student?s 18th birthday, despite the alleged torture or inhumane conditions.


The Turley Law Firm is investigating other potential claims. There are no up-front costs to plaintiffs as cases are taken on a contingency fee basis. If you feel you were defrauded or harmed in any way by any WWASPS facility, feel free to contact the Turley Law Firm at 1-800-692-4025, or visit their website and fill out their Evaluation Form at www.wturley.com.



Additional Links:


Turley Law Firm website:

http://www.wturley.com


Henricksen & Henriksen, PC website:

http://www.henriksenlaw.com


Press Releases:

http://webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?SES ... &aId=19171


http://webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?SES ... &aId=17516


helpyourteens.com/news/press_release_mom_defeats_corporate_giant.html



WWASP/WWASPS AFFILIATED PROGRAMS:


As of October 2006, it is believed that WWASP aka WWASPS has affiliations with the following facilities:


? Academy of Ivy Ridge, NY (Recently withdrew their affiliation with WWASPS)


? Bethel Girls Academy, Mississippi


? Eagle Point Christian Academy; Mississippi - (fka Bethel Boys Academy)


? Canyon View Park, MT


? Camas Ranch, MT


? Carolina Springs Academy, SC


? Cross Creek Programs, UT (Cross Creek Center for Boys and Cross Creek Manor)


? Darrington Academy, GA


? Help My Teen, UT (Believed to promote and market WWASP/WWASPS/Robert Lichfield-affiliated programs)


? Horizon Academy, NV


? Lifelines Family Services, UT (Believed to promote and market WWASP/WWASPS/Robert Lichfield-affiliated programs)


? Majestic Ranch, UT


? Midwest Academy, IA (Brian Viafanua, formerly the Director of Paradise Cove as shown on Primetime, is the current Director here)


? New Beginnings Maternity Home, Utah


? Pillars of Hope, Costa Rica (it is believed the program was set up for 18-22 year olds and that a new program has opened in Costa Rica for pre-teens and teens)


? Pine View Christian Academy (Borders FL, AL, MS)


? Reality Trek, UT


? Red River Academy, LA (Borders TX)


? Royal Peak Academy, CO (It is believed that Randall Hinton - who admitted using pepper spray on teens - is employed at this facility)


? Sky View Academy, NV


? Spring Creek Lodge, MT


? Teens In Crisis, LLC (Believed to promote and market WWASP/WWASPS/Robert Lichfield-affiliated programs)


? Teen Help, LLC (Believed to promote and market WWASP/WWASPS/Robert Lichfield-affiliated programs)


? Tranquility Bay, Jamaica


The Following WWASP Facilities Have Been Closed:


? Casa by the Sea


? Dundee Ranch Adademy, Costa Rica - raided and closed on May 22, 2003 after authorities confirmed child abuse


? Brightway Hospital, Utah - closed by authorities in 2002 for providing inadequate care and abuse of teenagers


? Morava Academy, Czech Republic - closed in 1998 after authorities confirmed abuse and arrested the directors Glenda (aka Glenn) and Steve Roach


? Sunrise Beach, Cancun Mexico - closed in 1996 after authorities alleged abuse Glenda (aka Glenn) and Steve Roach were directors.


? High Impact, Mexico - closed on the heels of an investigation into abuse


? Paradise Cove, Samoa - closed on the heels of an investigation into abuse --



Defendants named in the Amended Complaint include:


World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, Inc., Cross Creek Center for Boys, LLC, Cross Creek Manor, LLC, Majestic Ranch Academy, Inc., Academy of Ivy Ridge, Spring Creek Lodge, Inc., High Impact, Dundee Ranch, Casa by the Sea, Tranquility Bay, Carolina Springs Academy, Brightway Adolescent Hospital, Paradise Cove, Resource Realizations Inc., Peacock Enterprises, LLC, Dixie Contract Services, LLC, Premier Educational Systems, LLC, Robert Browning Lichfield Family Partnership, Teens in Crisis, LLC, Teen Help, LLC, R & B Management Group, LLC, R & B Billing, Robert B. Lichfield, Ken Kay, Karr Farnsworth, David Gilcrease, and John Does I through XX.

Related Links
 
CAICA Website
www.caica.org
 
Complaint
caica.org/Wood Complaint.pdf
 
Amended Complaint
caica.org/First Amended Complaint - Wood.pdf
 
 
Contact Information
Isabelle Zehnder
Founder and President
Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse (CAICA)
360-903-3951
info@caica.org
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2006, 12:58:41 PM »
If Whitmore parents read this; do they think: " doesen't all this reads a whole like our civil case against the Sudweeks?"

OH, but CA-CA can't talk about that, right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2006, 01:29:54 PM »
I'm curious how the parties involved in the Turley lawsuit feel about their names being published?  Personally, I'm not a party to the lawsuit but if I were, I don't know that I'd be all that comfortable having my identity and my child's identity publicized, but that's just me and like I said, I'm not a party to the lawsuit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2006, 01:45:24 PM »
I am certain that many are very uncomfortable about it, but there is nothing that can be done, as such filings are in fact public documents.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2006, 02:08:11 PM »
Yea, but isn't it a bit strange that it's always Izzy who one of the first to splatter everyone's name out there front-and-center?
She could black-out the minor children's names, if she cared to.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2006, 02:16:18 PM »
Or at least use initials for the parties involved?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2006, 02:22:26 PM »
Buzzkill, why didn't these plaintiffs on the Turley lawsuit join the lawsuit already in motion (the one filed in LA) which also has about 25 plaintiffs?  Why two lawsuits????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2006, 02:37:50 PM »
P.U.R.E.? Advocating for Children and Families

January 2004

Important Notice of Lawsuit Against WWASPS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE
CLASS/DIRECT ACTION
LAWSUIT AGAINST WWASPS

FRAUD, NEGLECT, ABUSE, INFLICTION OF MENTAL DISTRESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND CIVIL RACKETEERING

8 WWASP/S PROGRAMS ALREADY CLOSED ON THE HEALS OF GOVERNMENT RAIDS OR INVESTIGATIONS

WWASP/S CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS INCLUDE:


Bell Academy, California (closed)
Brightway Hospital, Utah (closed)
Carolina Springs Academy, South Carolina
Casa by the Sea, Mexico
Cross Creek Center, Utah
Cross Creek Manor, Utah
Dundee Ranch, Costa Rica (raided and closed)
High Impact, Mexico (raided and closed)
Ivy Ridge, New York
Majestic Ranch, Utah
Midwest Academy, Iowa
Morava Academy, Czech Republic (raided and closed)
Pacific View, Mexico
Paradise Cove, Western Samoa (closed)
Red Rock Springs, Utah (closed)
Spring Creek Lodge, Montana
Sunrise Beach, Mexico (raided and closed)
Tranquility Bay, Jamaica

Two highly experienced attorneys (each with over 30 years of trial experience) and resourceful California law firms have agreed to represent the families and children harmed by ANY of the numerous World Wide Association of Specialty Programs (a/k/a WWASP or WWASPS).

ATTORNEY HENRY I. BUSHKIN of Huron, Maki and Johnson and ATTORNEY ED MASRY of Masry & Vititoe, are the lead attorneys for this case. (Attorney Ed Masry is the lawyer portrayed in the movie Erin Brockovich.)

The lawsuits are on a contingency fee basis (meaning you owe nothing if the firm doesn't win).

Call Mr. Rick Wilf (assistant to Attorney Henry Bushkin) at (310) 284-3400 or email at http://www.helpyourteens.com/news/impor ... wasps.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2006, 02:47:54 PM »
Is there going to be a trial in the Whitmore civil lawsuit or are these kinds of cases typically settled out of court?  It is odd there is nothing on CAICA about the Whitmore parents lawsuit.  Is there anything on CAICA about the criminal investigation and the plea arrangement?  If not, ISAC has info on their website about this program, including news updates and documents, letters, etc.

http://www.isaccorp.org

See PRESS RELEASES and WHITMORE documents/files.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2006, 02:49:25 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Is there going to be a trial in the Whitmore civil lawsuit or are these kinds of cases typically settled out of court?  
http://www.isaccorp.org

See PRESS RELEASES and WHITMORE documents/files.



http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=18042
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2006, 06:25:24 PM »
NO--Izzy doesn't report on the Whitmore case.
you'd have to ask her why not.
Would think and "advocate" would do that--now wouldn't you?
 Think maybe her friend Sue Scheff's close connection to Whitmore might be the reason?
Sue Scheff reportedly referred most of those kids to Whitmore Academy....and reportedly continued to refer kids to Whitmore during the criminal investigation and after Cheryl Sudweeks was charged.

Whitmore Academy was on CAICA's "watchlist" at one time; but Izzy removed it.  Someone said it was removed about the time that Izzy and Sue Scheff seemed to develop this close relationship they seem to have.
If that is factual--not saying it is--that surely seems unlike something an "advocate against child abuse would do, in my opinion, anyway.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #28 on: October 19, 2006, 07:04:50 PM »
Isabelle Zehnder issued the following statement about Whitmore and other assertions in a press release. The italized text is Isabelle's response:

? They claim Sue Scheff refers children to abusive programs due to her referrals of children to the Whitmore Academy.

For over 30 years The Whitmore had a successful program with no allegations of abuse.



? They claim Cheryl Sudweeks, owner of the Whitmore Academy, pled guilty to specified charges in a Utah criminal court.


Cheryl did not admit any guilt. There was NO substantiated evidence against the Whitmore. The state admittedly had no case and agreed to a plea in abeyance. An article misstated facts and later corrected their mistakes, claiming Cheryl could never run a youth program in the county for the rest of her life. This is not true and they corrected their error.

? They assert Ms. Scheff makes money from the plight of frightened parents.

Ms. Scheff does not charge the parents for her services. To the contrary, Ms. Scheff is a parent and child advocate.

CAICA Press Release 10-8-06

Has Whitmore been operating 30 years?  I don't remember it being around that long but I suppose Isabelle would know better than I given that she wrote this press release.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #29 on: October 19, 2006, 09:01:02 PM »
Anyone who bashes Sue and Izzy that's fine but i'd rather find the truth for myself rather than going on peoples opinion I think that the whole reason people bash these two women is because they want to blame everyone except the real culprit and that's WWASP.  Who are you all against WWASP and what's been done to these kids or the people who are trying with all there might to help this isn't a game of politics in the end it's a game of who gets the word out the loudest and I think Izzy has done a wonderful job with that aspect of this issues with CAICA and so bash them all you want I think this site is infested with WWASP lovers and WWASP employed people for the truth is it's the internet and you don't know who the hell is on the other side. And as for me I don't like WWASP and I think they should be squashed!! :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »