Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
WARNING! This website presents distorted perspectives of ob
Anonymous:
Oh, but it's so much easier to distract from the truth by going after the 'easy targets' (pissed off kids, parents). That way they don't have to face up to what they've done. They can just write off any criticism at all and stay in fantasyland.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---http://www.isaccorp.org/documentsam.asp#hyde
If you are truly interested, go to the above website and read the documents
--- End quote ---
A bunch of meaningless crap at the site you refer to. Unsubstantiated (and likely fabricated/exaggerated) claims and no legal finding. Again, anyone can make things up (and even believe them in their own mind), but proving it in a court is a whole 'nother ball game. Yes, the case was settled by Hyde to reduce their financial losses, at the advice of counsel. But the settling plaintiff party got money, not a legal finding (if in fact their charges were even true in the first place) and there is no determination as to what "really" happened. This individual is no longer in a position of authority over kids at Hyde and probably will never be. If this persone were a convicted pedophile, then they should absolutely be banned from the campus and be on a sex offender registry. But to continue persecuting him based on the he said/she said of a disturbed teenage girl and her even more disturbed parent just isn't right. If there are confirmed cases of his continued inappropriate behavior, then perhaps there's a matter to discuss. But there doesn't seem to be any smoke here (except from what you're smoking), let alone fire. Sorry, I don't agree with you or your practices here.
--- End quote ---
Good points. But don't you think it creates an appearance iimpropriety to has Larry on campus?
On the other hand it, it is good that hyde is not tossing him as damaged goods and standing by him as part of the family, if he is in fact dealing with any alledged problems he may have had.
I think alot of the crap posted here on the subject is just that. There are a group of folk with a "woodie" for Hyde and will grab anything that smells bad and say "see I told you Hyde was fucked up"
--- End quote ---
How is it "likely fabricated, exaggerated?" How do you have this first hand knowledge? Please tell us!
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" --- How is it "likely fabricated, exaggerated?" How do you have this first hand knowledge? Please tell us!
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" --- How is it "likely fabricated, exaggerated?" How do you have this first hand knowledge? Please tell us!
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
If it were legit, ther would have been a police investigation and charges. Otherwise, not much there of substance to castrate someone for...
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" --- How is it "likely fabricated, exaggerated?" How do you have this first hand knowledge? Please tell us!
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
If it were legit, ther would have been a police investigation and charges. Otherwise, not much there of substance to castrate someone for...
--- End quote ---
Again you did not answer my question. Where is your knowledge coming from? How do you know there was not an investigation or charges? Are you Larry Dubinsky? If not, how do you know what happened?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version