Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
WARNING! This website presents distorted perspectives of ob
Anonymous:
They're not. The typical MO is to run in and post something witty like "Hyde is great" and leave. Either that or they just dismiss anyone with a complaint about Hyde as being "angry" and "disgruntled".
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---They're not. The typical MO is to run in and post something witty like "Hyde is great" and leave. Either that or they just dismiss anyone with a complaint about Hyde as being "angry" and "disgruntled".
--- End quote ---
Hey Hyde is great. Don't listen to the angry disgruntled people that post here.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---http://www.isaccorp.org/documentsam.asp#hyde
If you are truly interested, go to the above website and read the documents
--- End quote ---
A bunch of meaningless crap at the site you refer to. Unsubstantiated (and likely fabricated/exaggerated) claims and no legal finding. Again, anyone can make things up (and even believe them in their own mind), but proving it in a court is a whole 'nother ball game. Yes, the case was settled by Hyde to reduce their financial losses, at the advice of counsel. But the settling plaintiff party got money, not a legal finding (if in fact their charges were even true in the first place) and there is no determination as to what "really" happened. This individual is no longer in a position of authority over kids at Hyde and probably will never be. If this persone were a convicted pedophile, then they should absolutely be banned from the campus and be on a sex offender registry. But to continue persecuting him based on the he said/she said of a disturbed teenage girl and her even more disturbed parent just isn't right. If there are confirmed cases of his continued inappropriate behavior, then perhaps there's a matter to discuss. But there doesn't seem to be any smoke here (except from what you're smoking), let alone fire. Sorry, I don't agree with you or your practices here.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---http://www.isaccorp.org/documentsam.asp#hyde
If you are truly interested, go to the above website and read the documents
--- End quote ---
A bunch of meaningless crap at the site you refer to. Unsubstantiated (and likely fabricated/exaggerated) claims and no legal finding. Again, anyone can make things up (and even believe them in their own mind), but proving it in a court is a whole 'nother ball game. Yes, the case was settled by Hyde to reduce their financial losses, at the advice of counsel. But the settling plaintiff party got money, not a legal finding (if in fact their charges were even true in the first place) and there is no determination as to what "really" happened. This individual is no longer in a position of authority over kids at Hyde and probably will never be. If this persone were a convicted pedophile, then they should absolutely be banned from the campus and be on a sex offender registry. But to continue persecuting him based on the he said/she said of a disturbed teenage girl and her even more disturbed parent just isn't right. If there are confirmed cases of his continued inappropriate behavior, then perhaps there's a matter to discuss. But there doesn't seem to be any smoke here (except from what you're smoking), let alone fire. Sorry, I don't agree with you or your practices here.
--- End quote ---
Good points. But don't you think it creates an appearance iimpropriety to has Larry on campus?
On the other hand it, it is good that hyde is not tossing him as damaged goods and standing by him as part of the family, if he is in fact dealing with any alledged problems he may have had.
I think alot of the crap posted here on the subject is just that. There are a group of folk with a "woodie" for Hyde and will grab anything that smells bad and say "see I told you Hyde was fucked up"
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---http://www.isaccorp.org/documentsam.asp#hyde
If you are truly interested, go to the above website and read the documents
--- End quote ---
A bunch of meaningless crap at the site you refer to. Unsubstantiated (and likely fabricated/exaggerated) claims and no legal finding. Again, anyone can make things up (and even believe them in their own mind), but proving it in a court is a whole 'nother ball game. Yes, the case was settled by Hyde to reduce their financial losses, at the advice of counsel. But the settling plaintiff party got money, not a legal finding (if in fact their charges were even true in the first place) and there is no determination as to what "really" happened. This individual is no longer in a position of authority over kids at Hyde and probably will never be. If this persone were a convicted pedophile, then they should absolutely be banned from the campus and be on a sex offender registry. But to continue persecuting him based on the he said/she said of a disturbed teenage girl and her even more disturbed parent just isn't right. If there are confirmed cases of his continued inappropriate behavior, then perhaps there's a matter to discuss. But there doesn't seem to be any smoke here (except from what you're smoking), let alone fire. Sorry, I don't agree with you or your practices here.
--- End quote ---
Good points. But don't you think it creates an appearance iimpropriety to has Larry on campus?
On the other hand it, it is good that hyde is not tossing him as damaged goods and standing by him as part of the family, if he is in fact dealing with any alledged problems he may have had.
I think alot of the crap posted here on the subject is just that. There are a group of folk with a "woodie" for Hyde and will grab anything that smells bad and say "see I told you Hyde was fucked up"
--- End quote ---
What evidence do you have that the student and parent are both "disturbed"? Those are pretty strong claims. Isn't it possible that they have legitimate complaints to make against Hyde? I'm willing to believe that some Hyde critiques may exaggerate, but I know, based on what I've observed first hand, that some of the serious complaints against Hyde are absolutely valid. They don't necessarily come via "disturbed" parents or students.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version