Author Topic: CAICA  (Read 15027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #135 on: October 25, 2006, 02:34:55 PM »
No only jealous, but very mature  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #136 on: October 25, 2006, 03:03:47 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Wonder why IZZY isn't posting these so-called landmark case  transcripts on CA-CA????


 :D   Hmmm.  Maybe she can't get them.  They are expensive from what I hear.  Perhaps SS will donate them to her good friend and colleague Isabelle.  Or, if Carey has them, she can donate them to ISAC?  I like this suggestion better as it would mean I wouldn't have to visit the CAICA website -- something that tends to give me a splitting headache for some reason.

 :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #137 on: October 25, 2006, 06:17:11 PM »
Any word yet on whether Bock is going to appeal?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff is a Con Artist and a Fraud on the Public
« Reply #138 on: October 25, 2006, 06:47:17 PM »
Look in the mirror on the wall Sue and repeat the truth:

"I Sue Scheff am a con artist and a fraud".

 Wouldnt it be interesting if a court heard Sue on tape calling herself a con artist?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Izzy
« Reply #139 on: October 25, 2006, 06:50:18 PM »
You too Izzy.  Same exercise with the mirror.

Izzy---------the problem is not whether there are good or bad programs out there---------the problem is that neither you nor Sue Scheff can tell the difference between a good one or a bad one.  your self promotors and money grubbers.

Duh.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #140 on: October 25, 2006, 07:23:21 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Jealousy is ugly.


Sending kids off to abusive facilities for profit is ugly.  Bitch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #141 on: October 25, 2006, 07:23:52 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
I think I heard the newscaster say (paraphrasing here) that the defendant, Carey Bock, did not show up for trial making it easier for the plaintiff to win her judgement.

Anybody else hear that?


Yes, she did say that.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Sue and CAICA the two primo donna bitches of America
« Reply #142 on: October 26, 2006, 10:50:25 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Jealousy is ugly.

Sending kids off to abusive facilities for profit is ugly.  Bitch.


ditto you two total bitches.  you also had to stick your noses into a lawsuit that does not concern you, giving ken kay ammunition to say it was started by a "competitor".  you two (yes you dumb ass Isabelle and you dumb fuck Sue), you both need to butt your asses out of what is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.  you fat old rags.  while your at it-get the hell out of the country.  PIGS
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Sue and CAICA the two primo donna bitches of America
« Reply #143 on: October 26, 2006, 11:32:17 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Jealousy is ugly.

Sending kids off to abusive facilities for profit is ugly.  Bitch.

ditto you two total bitches.  you also had to stick your noses into a lawsuit that does not concern you, giving ken kay ammunition to say it was started by a "competitor".  you two (yes you dumb ass Isabelle and you dumb fuck Sue), you both need to butt your asses out of what is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.  you fat old rags.  while your at it-get the hell out of the country.  PIGS


I take it you haven't heard the latest news?

"CAICA GOES INTERNATIONAL"

http://www.caica.org

What this means, I do not know (nor care) but I suspect the IZ will gladly keep us all posted.

Parlay Voo Fransay?

 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #144 on: November 27, 2006, 06:52:11 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Yes, most likely the judge and jury did not know why Bock called Scheff a ed con, fraud and what ever else she called her.  

Most likely they, the judge and jury, did not see the testimony that Bock posted here on Fornits and the emails exchanged that showed why she believed Scheff was all of those things she called her.

This whole case has become a marketing ploy for Scheff.  Her paying all the money she paid for this case to go to court, knowing she would probably never be able to collect a dime, really has been money well spent.  Look at all the attention she is getting from it.  Good or bad, it is still attention.


According to this news report, Scheff took a second out on her home to pay her legal costs.  

--------------------------

Susan Scheff, of Weston, Fla., recently won $11.3 million in a defamation suit against a Louisiana woman who posted messages on the Internet accusing her of being a "crook," a "con artist" and a "fraud."

"I never expect to collect $11.3 million," said Scheff, who took a second mortgage on her home to pay the legal tab. "She went out there and discredited me and destroyed me and my family on the Internet. ... Whenever you Googled me, you saw these things."

Scheff has a business called Parents Universal Resource Experts that helps parents of troubled children find services such as schools.

Denver Post
November 22, 2006
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #145 on: November 27, 2006, 07:06:41 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
... Whenever you Googled me, you saw these things."




  ::bwahaha:: Still do.  Those things and more.
 :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #146 on: November 27, 2006, 08:19:06 PM »
A second mortgage on her home to pay the legal bills?
Thought it was reported she was a "trust fund baby?" Don't "trust fund babies" own thier home free-and clear; and just roll in money?
Thought it was also reported that insurance picked up Mr. Pollack's fees.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +3/-3
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #147 on: April 20, 2007, 03:44:29 AM »
When CAICA first formed, it solicited donations claiming that it had filed with the IRS as a tax-exempt non-profit org. and was awaiting official confirmation.  

CAICA used to be called Kids in Captivity.

Personally, I would be very reluctant to donate any money to this org. given the lack of transparency.

If it's a non-profit, where is the IRS verification?  

Check out the ISAC website which is a 501 (c) 3 non profit which means donations are tax-deductible.  They provide information on how to verify their non-profit IRS status.

http://www.issaccorp.org

This does NOT appear to be the case with CAICA as far as I can tell.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »