This sick sick website

[AtomicAnt]

On 2006-06-14 14:49:00, Anonymous wrote:

""...When compared with the suppression of anarchy every other question sinks into insignificance. The anarchist is the enemy of humanity, the enemy of all mankind, and his is a deeper degree of criminality than any other. No immigrant is allowed to come to our shores if he is an anarchist; and no paper published here or abroad should be permitted circulation in this country if it propagates anarchist opinions." Theodore Roosevelt, 1908





Teddy would have loved this site and its anarchists.



To say this site promotes a freedom that is endowed upon us for positive purpose in an effort to discover truth, is completely laughable.

An insult to those who concieved the idea, and to all who have defended its inception.





"

One of the best ways to eliminate an enemy is to make them look ridiculous, or vilify them as being evil. That is what Teddy was doing. In 1908 there was an anarchist movement in this country. Look up Emma Goldman.  Look up anarchy in Wikipedia.

The myth is that anarchists are violent and wish to violently overthrow the government. The truth is that anarchists believe that all forms of authoritarian hierarchy are inherently unjust. There are anarchists who are pacifists.

Governments have to be against anarchy for the simple fact that the anarchist does not believe in legitimate authority. What gives any person, or group of people the 'right' to tell another person or group of people what to do? Nothing. It boils down to force. Even in a democracy,

"... a slave to the majority is still a slave."

          - Max Stirner

With that philosophy, anarchist thinking is the greatest danger to government, authority, and repression. Since there is no logical refutation, governments have no choice to but to fight these ideas by banning books (like Max Stirner's) and calling anarchists "the enemy of all mankind." In other words, they resort to using fear and propaganda.[ This Message was edited by: AtomicAnt on 2006-06-14 19:53 ]

[Anonymous]

On 2006-06-14 17:14:00, Anonymous wrote:

"

On 2006-06-14 14:49:00, Anonymous wrote:


""...When compared with the suppression of anarchy every other question sinks into insignificance. The anarchist is the enemy of humanity, the enemy of all mankind, and his is a deeper degree of criminality than any other. No immigrant is allowed to come to our shores if he is an anarchist; and no paper published here or abroad should be permitted circulation in this country if it propagates anarchist opinions." Theodore Roosevelt, 1908








Teddy would have loved this site and its anarchists.





To say this site promotes a freedom that is endowed upon us for positive purpose in an effort to discover truth, is completely laughable.


An insult to those who concieved the idea, and to all who have defended its inception.








"

 :tup: "

quoting a president to rail against the first ammendment protection of free-speech... who are you going to quote next, ashcroft or gonzalez? you make me laugh. you should be counting your blessings, its only a matter of time until the constitutional is fully destroyed and you can thank your diety for saving you.

[Anonymous]

i should add... at the behest of ignorami and cowards such as yourself.

[Anonymous]

Count his blessings?

His blessings are hard earned mutherfucker.
18 years active duty US Navy protecting freedom.
MBA/MPP: public policy
Masters: physics
Doctorate: psychology



Tell me asswad: Other than run your mouth displaying your so called freedom to use it...what do YOU do to protect that freedom?

My guess is, you think.
Thats it.
You THINK you have a right to be heard.
And you THINK someone is listening.

Your idea that the freedom of speech is threatened is nullified by vocalizing it.

Shut the fuck up and THINK of something worthy to say.  

The site has been the subject of recent lectures (2) after being brought to my attention at the University I attend.
Our reluctant professor was forced to post the dialogue you rected to with such class and tact.

Not often someone with intellectual capacity force feeds an audience the load of shit you just dolled out.

Thanks for the laughs. The sites obscure and rediculous dialogue is somewhat enjoyable, yet in an odd way, heartbreaking to witness.

Im glad youre all anon. I'd hate to experiene the feeling of knowing someone aboard this sinking ship of fools.

[Carmel]

On 2006-06-14 22:21:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Count his blessings?



His blessings are hard earned mutherfucker.

18 years active duty US Navy protecting freedom.

MBA/MPP: public policy

Masters: physics

Doctorate: psychology







Tell me asswad: Other than run your mouth displaying your so called freedom to use it...what do YOU do to protect that freedom?



My guess is, you think.

Thats it.

You THINK you have a right to be heard.

And you THINK someone is listening.



Your idea that the freedom of speech is threatened is nullified by vocalizing it.



Shut the fuck up and THINK of something worthy to say.  



The site has been the subject of recent lectures (2) after being brought to my attention at the University I attend.

Our reluctant professor was forced to post the dialogue you rected to with such class and tact.



Not often someone with intellectual capacity force feeds an audience the load of shit you just dolled out.



Thanks for the laughs. The sites obscure and rediculous dialogue is somewhat enjoyable, yet in an odd way, heartbreaking to witness.



Im glad youre all anon. I'd hate to experiene the feeling of knowing someone aboard this sinking ship of fools.







"

And the meek shall inherit the earth.....god bless the little people!

[Anonymous]

On 2006-06-14 22:21:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Count his blessings?



His blessings are hard earned mutherfucker.

18 years active duty US Navy protecting freedom.

MBA/MPP: public policy

Masters: physics

Doctorate: psychology







Tell me asswad: Other than run your mouth displaying your so called freedom to use it...what do YOU do to protect that freedom?



My guess is, you think.

Thats it.

You THINK you have a right to be heard.

And you THINK someone is listening.



Your idea that the freedom of speech is threatened is nullified by vocalizing it.



Shut the fuck up and THINK of something worthy to say.  



The site has been the subject of recent lectures (2) after being brought to my attention at the University I attend.

Our reluctant professor was forced to post the dialogue you rected to with such class and tact.



Not often someone with intellectual capacity force feeds an audience the load of shit you just dolled out.



Thanks for the laughs. The sites obscure and rediculous dialogue is somewhat enjoyable, yet in an odd way, heartbreaking to witness.



Im glad youre all anon. I'd hate to experiene the feeling of knowing someone aboard this sinking ship of fools.







"

 :tup:

[Anonymous]

quoting a president to rail against the first ammendment protection of free-speech... who are you going to quote next, ashcroft or gonzalez? you make me laugh. you should be counting your blessings, its only a matter of time until the constitutional is fully destroyed and you can thank your diety for saving you."
[/quote]
So .. this forum is a polital thing for you? Are you running for office Ginger? Continuing to trample others rights for the sake of protecting criminals.. Thats just like the very administration you "rail" against.
you are really facinating.

[Troll Control]

And you are an idiot.

[StellerJay]

I am confused, angry anon, did your professor (or was it you?) post a comment reluctantly so he could get a reaction? Are you trolling to start an argument and get upset when it happens?
And, by the way, serving as an active duty soilder for 18 years is a choice. Simply because others do not sign up for the military does not indicate a lack of patriotism or a lack of want to protect our freedoms.  I come from a long line of military men and women. I did not join-does that make me a civilian coward in your book? Does it make you angry that I and other outspoken people question your (or your professors?) employer (i.e., government)? I hope it does---then I know that my freedom of speech and self expression is still fully functional and there isnt a damn thing anyone can do to take it away from me. :grin:

[Anonymous]

On 2006-06-15 09:16:00, StellerJay wrote:

"I am confused, angry anon, did your professor (or was it you?) post a comment reluctantly so he could get a reaction? Are you trolling to start an argument and get upset when it happens?

And, by the way, serving as an active duty soilder for 18 years is a choice. Simply because others do not sign up for the military does not indicate a lack of patriotism or a lack of want to protect our freedoms.  I come from a long line of military men and women. I did not join-does that make me a civilian coward in your book? Does it make you angry that I and other outspoken people question your (or your professors?) employer (i.e., government)? I hope it does---then I know that my freedom of speech and self expression is still fully functional and there isnt a damn thing anyone can do to take it away from me. :grin: "

I hardly see where that was the op point
now your just making shit up

[Anonymous]

you bore me *yawn*  ::ribbon::

[Anonymous]

On 2006-06-15 08:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

Continuing to trample others rights for the sake of protecting criminals..

Who's rights is she supposedly tampling on?  My god, get a fucking grip.  This is a free society (well, for the moment).  You don't have a "right" to be "protected" from things you find offensive.  Don't like it?  Get the fuck out.

[Anonymous]

Is there any form of public forum where profanity, threats, insults, pornographic dialogue and occasional explicit photos are an accepted form of addressing an audience?

(Other than this pathetic farce?)

I am not offended by anything that is said here.
I am offended that people actually think any of it is taken seriously, or with any level of humor.

Never underestimate the power of supid people in large groups.

[odie]

On 2006-06-15 11:15:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Is there any form of public forum where profanity, threats, insults, pornographic dialogue and occasional explicit photos are an accepted form of addressing an audience?




Yahoo discussion forums come to mind right off the top. And guess what? You can actually change the channel if you don't like what you see! :wave:

Either cocaine and marijuana are terribly dangerous substances, and breaking the law by consuming them is a major offense that should be severely punished, or these are minor, personal matters that do not really count in the big picture of a man's life. If the latter is the case, then the rationale for a bloody, costly and futile war against drugs simply disappears.
--Jorge G. Castaneda, Newsweek International, September 6, 1999

[Carmel]

Try attending your local rock concert......or how about switching on VH1 and watching the latest Hip-Hop video?

All I am sayin here is that if you have such a distaste for what is going on here in the forum.....then dont read or reply to it.  This forum isnt a headline on CNN.com, if you want to be up in arms about obscenity.....take it to the real battle grounds man, the ones plastered all up in our faces 24 hours a day.  It seems to me that a person of your obvious, self-perceived prominence would know better than to waste their time in the side skirmish.

You obviously ARE offended by what is said here, because you prefaced your post with a marked distaste for forms of expression that you find to be a "farce".  You have just as much right to hate it as anyone eles does to love it, however.  

Taken seriously?  I'd like to quote Mulder here and say that "the truth is out there"......those who need to take it seriously will, and most probably will be intelligent and sensitive enough to see past the foul agression sometimes posted here.  Apparently for all of your educated prowess, you very simply do not posses these qualities.....either that, or youre just trying to stir up trouble.  It really makes no difference whether or not we think we should be taken seriously by someone who has an axe to grind from the outset, namely someone like you.

We are all capable of handling this is a more amenable manner.  Why should anyone be required to alter the forum based on a singular opinion?  Its not fair.