Billy--- feel free to address me in whatever manner you're comfortable. Your continued postings on this site give you the opportunity to hone your powers of deductive reasoning, which, if they are ever to be sharp enough to compete in the market place of ideas with real players, must be dispassionate.
When you get past the first couple of pages of my paper, do let me know how you feel about it. Your are in an interesting position to judge its veracity, since we seminared together during our overlapping time at Hyde.
Of course I'm bashing noone. Candidly, however, I must say that in retrospect I find Joe Gauld's treatment of me- and others- and, more importantly, the failure of staff to address his transgressions openly, extremely disturbing. Duncan McCrann behaved in a manner that was thoroughly unprofessional, and in my opinion, cowardly. I refrain from indulging in wit for wit's sake and therefore will not refer to him as the "cravenly Mr. McCrann," though I find the phrase apt. I'm sure he has fine qualities as well.
Keep challenging those who, in your judgement, shoot from the hip on this site and attack only for the sake of striking out! Who does that enterprise serve? I continue to be impressed with your impartiality... it takes courage to swim upstream- keep up the good work!
Gary Eskow