Where are the HLA "professionals" when serious questions are asked?
Why has HLA never sponsored a longitudinal study to assess the effectiveness of their program?
Why does HLA rely on anecdotal evidence/"polls" from a few patients served up via a censored website to "prove" their efficacy if indeed their practices hold up to conventional treatment standards?
Why will the HLA staff not engage anyone in real debate about their treatment center?
Why do they avoid meaningful inquiries while baiting and degrading less sophisticated posters?
If you won't answer these simple questions and continue to avoid pertinent questions, then you will continue to be viewed as you currently are: manipulators who avoid accountability.
Again, I'd be glad to debate you over the facts regarding HLA's treatment program or the RTC/TBS modality as a whole. So let's get started by answering the questions posed above as well as the definitive, longitudinal study by the NIH.